0
$\begingroup$

A pair $(q,r)$ is $\alpha-$fractional admissible if $q\geq 2, r\geq 2$ and $$\frac{\alpha}{q} = d \left( \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{r} \right).$$

We take fractional Schrodinger propagator $U(t)=e^{it (-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}}.$ I state the following result from the paper, see Corollary 3.10.

Result: Let $d\ge 2$ and $\frac{2d}{2d-1} < \alpha \leq 2.$ Assume that $\phi$ and $F$ are radial. Then

(1) For any $\alpha-$fractional admissible pair $(p,q),$ there exists $C_q$ such that $$\|U(t) \phi \|_{L^{p,q}_{t,x}} \leq C_q \|\phi \|_{L^2}, \ \forall \phi \in L^2 (\mathbb R^d).$$ (2) Define $$DF(t,x) = \int_0^t U(t-\tau )F(\tau,x) d\tau.$$ For all $\alpha-$fractional admissible pair $(p_i,q_i), (i=1, 2)$, there exists $C$ (constant) such that for all intervals $I \ni 0, $ $$ \|D(F)\|_{L^{p_1, q_1}_{t,x}} \leq C \|F\|_{L^{p_2', q_2'}_{t,x}}, \ \forall F \in L^{p_2'} (I, L^{q_2'})$$ where $p_i'$ and $ q_i'$ are H\"older conjugates of $p_i$ and $q_i'$ respectively.

My Questions are: (1) When $\alpha>2,$ the analogue of above result available? If so, can you suggests some references? (2)Why do we need radial assumption when $\alpha \neq 2$?

Edit: I guess, Proposition 2.2 in the paper might be useful? Though I'm not sure.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.