5
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a discrete group which acts continuously on a Stonean space $\Omega$. Consider the map $f\colon \Omega\to \{0,1\}^G$ sending $x\in \Omega$ to $\chi_{G_x}$, where $\chi_{G_x}$ denotes the characteristic function of the stabilizer $G_x$.

Why is $f$ continuous?

We can restrict to the subbasis-sets of the product topology and for $g\in G$ fixed, it is enough to consider the preimages of $\{0\}\times \{0,1\}^{G\setminus \{g\}}$ and $\{1\}\times \{0,1\}^{G\setminus \{g\}}$ under $f$, which must be open in $\Omega$. That $f^{-1}(\{0\}\times \{0,1\}^{G\setminus \{g\}}) $ is open in $\Omega$ can be seen using that in the Hausdorff space $\Omega$, the diagonal $\{(x,x)\in \Omega\times \Omega\mid x\in \Omega\}$ is closed in $\Omega\times \Omega$, but without using that $\Omega$ is Stonean.

My question therefore reduces to: Why is $ f^{-1}(\{1\}\times \{0,1\}^{G\setminus \{g\}}) $ open in $\Omega$ ? I think to prove this, it must be used that $\Omega$ is Stonean and probably it helps to know that in a Stonean space, the closure of disjoint open sets is again disjoint.

The background of my question is the following: I am currently reading the paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.01870.pdf and that $f$ is continuous is used in the proof of Theorem 4.1, direction $<=$.

$\endgroup$
2

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

It's indeed true: whenever a discrete group $G$ acts continuously on a Hausdorff, extremally disconnected space $X$, then the map $x\mapsto G_x$ is continuous, where the set of subgroups of $G$ is endowed with its compact topology given by inclusion in $2^G$.

One has to show that for any $g\in G$, the map $u_g:x\mapsto \chi_{G_x}(g)$, $X\to\{0,1\}$ is continuous. That is, that $u_g^{-1}(\{0\})$ and $u_g^{-1}(\{1\})$ are both closed.

That $u_g^{-1}(\{0\})=\{x:gx=x\}$ is closed holds for whenever $G$ acts continuously on a Hausdorff topological space. (It's false when $X$ is not assumed Hausdorff.)

The claim is that $u_g^{-1}(\{1\})=\{x:gx\neq x\}$ is closed for every $g$.

Assume otherwise: this means that there exists $x_0\in X$ such that $gx_0=x_0$ and $x_0$ is in the closure of $\{x:gx\neq x\}$. Let $V\subset X$ an open subset, maximal for the property that $V\cap gV=\emptyset$.

Claim: if $X$ is Hausdorff, then $x_0$ belongs to the closure of $V$. Indeed, let $U$ be the complement of this closure. If by contradiction $x_0\in U$, define $U'=U\cap g^{-1}U$: this is an open neighborhood of $x_0$. By assumption, there exists $x\in U'$ with $gx\neq x$. Using that $X$ is Hausdorff, one can find an open neighborhood $V'$ of $x$, with $V'\subset U'$ and $V'\cap gV'=\emptyset$. Then taking $V\cup V'$ contradicts the maximality of $V$.

But then $x_0$ also belongs to the closure of $gV$. Assuming that $X$ is extremally disconnected, this contradicts that $V$ and $gV$ are disjoint.

The latter argument shows more generally that for any continuous self-map $g$ of a Hausdorff extremally disconnected space $X$, the closed subset $\{x:g(x)=x\}$ is also open.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Nice, I understand. Thank you very much $\endgroup$ Nov 14, 2018 at 10:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.