8
$\begingroup$

This problem has been posted on Math.SE for seven days, without a solution.

Let $n\ge 2$ be a given positive integer, and $a_{1},a_{2},\cdots,a_{n}>0$, such that $$a_{1}a_{2}\cdots a_{n}=1$$ Find the maximum of the value of $C(n)$ satisfying $$\sum_{k=1}^{n}\left(\dfrac{1}{k}-\dfrac{2}{n(n+1)}\right)a_{k}\ge C(n)\left(\sum_{k=1}^{n}\dfrac{k^2}{a_{k}}\right)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}$$

This inequality is similar to Hardy's inequality on Math.SE, Various proofs of Hardy's inequality.

I have tried some methods but not solved it, such as Cauchy-Schwarz inequality or induction.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why similar to Hardy's inequality? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 10, 2018 at 13:05

2 Answers 2

9
+25
$\begingroup$

At first, we denote $c_k=\frac1k-\frac2{n(n+1)}$, take $C(n)=(n-1) \biggl( \frac{2}{n(n+1)!} \biggr)^{1/(n-1)}$ as in Brendan McKay's answer, and make the inequality homogeneous: $$\sum_{k=1}^n c_k a_k\geqslant C(n) \left(\sum_{k=1}^n k^2 \prod_{j\ne k} a_j\right)^{\frac1{n-1}}.$$ Now we do not need the condition $\prod a_j=1$. Denote $a_k=kx_k$, using Brendan McKay's guess on where is the maximum. The inequality rewrites as $$\sum_{k=1}^n kc_k x_k\geqslant C(n) (n!)^{\frac1{n-1}} \left(\sum_{k=1}^n k \prod_{j\ne k} x_j\right)^{\frac1{n-1}}.$$ Now we fix LHS and maximise RHS. If the maximum point is on the boundary, i.e. some $x_i$ equals 0, the inequality reduces to AM-GM for $n-1$ numbers $kc_kx_k$, $k\ne i$ (and comparing the constants - this part is quite boring and I skip it). Otherwise by Lagrange multipliers the partial derivatives of $\sum_{k=1}^n k \prod_{j\ne k} x_j$ in the maximum point should be proportional to the numbers $kc_k$. We have $$\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i} \sum_{k=1}^n k \prod_{j\ne k} x_j=P\sum_{k\ne i} \frac{k}{x_k x_i},$$ where $P=\prod_k x_k$. So we get, denoting $y_k=\frac1{x_k}$, the following proportionality relations: $\sum_{k\ne i} ky_ky_i=\lambda c_k=\lambda (1-\frac{2i}{n(n+1)})=\frac{\lambda}{n(n+1)/2}\sum_{k\ne i} k$. Now denote $M=\max y_i$, let $M=y_a$, $m=\min y_i$, let $m=y_b$. For $i=a$ we have $$\frac{\lambda}{n(n+1)/2}\sum_{k\ne a} k=\sum_{k\ne a} ky_ky_a\geqslant Mm\sum_{k\ne a} k,$$ for $i=b$ we have $$\frac{\lambda}{n(n+1)/2}\sum_{k\ne b} k=\sum_{k\ne b} ky_ky_b\leqslant Mm\sum_{k\ne b} k.$$ Therefore $\frac{\lambda}{n(n+1)/2}=Mm$ and we have equalities everywhere. For $n\geqslant 3$ it implies that all $y$'s, thus all $x$'s are equal and the equality occurs. For $n=2$ we always have the equality.

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

On the basis of rather convincing numerical evidence (iterative optimisation that always converges to the same place regardless of starting point), I conjecture that the worst case is $$ a_i = \frac{i}{(n!)^{1/n}}.$$

I believe that gives $$C(n) = (n-1) \biggl( \frac{2}{n(n+1)!} \biggr)^{1/(n-1)} = e - \frac{e(7\ln n-\ln 2+\ln\pi)}{2n} + O((\ln n)^2/n^2).$$

The method is as boring as can be imagined. Start with a random vector a then make random changes to it, rejecting the change if the ratio of left side to right side gets greater. Stop when it hasn't changed for quite a while. Here is Maple code and sample output for $n=7$. Note that the vector is written with normalisation $a_1=1$ even though the function is calculated with $\prod a_i=1$; this is to make it easy to verify the conjecture by eye. Increase the value of Digits to get more precise verification.

# C(a) = left side divided by right side when a is normalised to product 1
C := proc(a::list) local b,s,k,n;
    n := numelems(a);
    s := mul(a)^(1/n);
    add((1/k-2/n/(n+1))*a[k]/s,k=1..n) / add(k^2*s/a[k],k=1..n)^(1/(n-1));
    evalf(%);
end proc:

eps := rand(-0.005..0.005):
r := rand(0.0..1.0):

n := 7;              # Insert value of n here
p := rand(1..n):
a := [seq(r(),i=1..n)]:
Ca := C(a):
# Initial values
a,Ca;

while true do
   currC := Ca:
   for iter to 5000 do
      a := a / a[1];     # Normalise to a[1]=1, note definition of C()
      pos := p():
      old := a[pos]:
      a[pos] := max(old+eps(),0.0):
      newCa := C(a):
      if newCa < Ca then Ca := newCa: else a[pos] := old: end if:
   end do:
   print(a,Ca);
   if Ca = currC then break end if:
end do:

# Compare to conjecture
evalf((n-1)*(2/(n*(n+1)!))^(1/(n-1)));

                             n := 7
  [0.01506015221, 0.07126263187, 0.6247572599, 0.8230410086,  0.3693148049, 0.7607420702, 0.4647867183], 1.130896511
[1.000000000, 2.539500613, 16.40072680, 21.91302565, 10.73273281, 20.16793736, 13.31584408], 0.9921703822
[1.000000000, 1.724599348, 6.508732912, 8.844028091, 5.179715013, 8.535313648, 6.434865587], 0.8859967880
[1.000000000, 1.922974212, 3.388120139, 5.041522591, 4.236184244, 6.150065920, 4.972451482], 0.8403143690
[0.9999999998, 2.003100092, 3.006977468, 4.342457370, 5.023819919, 6.039027264, 6.158267516], 0.8324458625
[1.000000000, 2.000240008, 3.000252639, 4.000077928, 5.000611566, 6.000674528, 7.000510740], 0.8315464026
[1.000000000, 2.000204912, 3.000252639, 4.000077928, 5.000451793, 6.000674528, 7.000510740], 0.8315464022
[1.000000000, 2.000204912, 3.000252639, 4.000077928, 5.000451793, 6.000674528, 7.000510740], 0.8315464022
                          0.8315464026
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Can you share your code, please? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 10, 2018 at 18:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .