3
$\begingroup$

Note: Since what I am asking about below touches on a potentially controversial subject, let me emphasize that I am only asking for a specific reference, and I am not asking for a discussion of the controversy itself, or even for other references besides the specific one I'm asking about.

Some years ago, I recall seeing an erratum that I would now like to cite, but I'm having trouble finding it because I don't remember enough details about it.

What I remember for sure is that the entire content of the erratum was to assert that the use of "Taniyama–Shimura" in the original article should be replaced by "Shimura–Taniyama." I'm also nearly certain that there was nothing else on the same page of the journal/periodical in which this erratum appeared.

I think that the erratum appeared in the Notices of the American Mathematical Society, but after a few minutes of futile searching, I'm beginning to doubt myself.

Does anyone recognize what I'm talking about?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
1
  • 10
    $\begingroup$ You're looking for Ribet's Erratum to "Galois Representations and Modular Forms". $\endgroup$
    – Sofie Verbeek
    Commented Sep 30, 2018 at 19:05

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
3
$\begingroup$

Thanks to Sofie Verbeek for the answer. The reference is

Erratum to "Galois Representations and Modular Forms" by Kenneth A. Ribet, Bulletin (New Series) of the American Mathematical Society 33 (1996), p. 43.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .