I will just repeat the title:

Is there a closed non-smoothable 4-manifold with zero Euler characteristic?

I am guessing yes simply based on other existence theorems I have seen for 4-manifolds.


The Kirby-Siebenmann invariant in $H^4(M;\Bbb Z/2)$, an obstruction to smoothability, is additive under connected sum in dimension 4. In even dimensions, $\chi(M \# N) = \chi(M) + \chi(N) -2$.

To construct manifolds with nontrivial Kirby-Siebenmann invariant we should apply Freedman's theorem: simply connected topological 4-manifolds are determined by their intersection form and Kirby-Siebenmann invariant; if the intersection form is odd, both Kirby-Siebenmann invariants are realized, and if the intersection form is even, only one KS-invariant is realized. So there is a topological manifold $F(\Bbb{CP}^2)$, homotopy equivalent to $\Bbb{CP}^2$ but with nontrivial Kirby-Siebenmann invariant.

So for the desired non-smoothable manifold with zero Euler characteristic, one can take (for instance) $$F(\Bbb{CP}^2) \# 3\Bbb{CP}^2 \#(S^2 \times \Sigma_2).$$

  • $\begingroup$ Is there any easy explanation on why $F(CP^2)$ exists? $\endgroup$ Sep 27 '18 at 11:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AnubhavMukherjee This is Freedman's theorem, stated here. I do not think there is an easy explanation for the existence of any non-smoothable 4-manifold. $\endgroup$
    – mme
    Sep 27 '18 at 13:04
  • $\begingroup$ yes you are right. All of a sudden I forgot about that theorem. Thanks :) $\endgroup$ Sep 27 '18 at 13:07
  • $\begingroup$ It is not stated at the link I provided, sorry. I edited a statement into my answer. $\endgroup$
    – mme
    Sep 27 '18 at 13:15
  • $\begingroup$ This statement is there in the Kirby calculus book by Gompf and Stipshicz $\endgroup$ Sep 27 '18 at 13:20

Alternatively, one can start with the $E_8$-manifold and connect sum with (five copies of) $S^1\times S^3$, and appeal to Donaldson's diagonalisation theorem instead.

More precisely, the (negative) $E_8$-plumbing $P$ bounds the Poincaré homology sphere $Y$; by Freedman's theorem, $Y$ is also the boundary of a contractible topological 4-manifold $W$, and gluing $P\cup_Y -W$ yields a closed, simply connected topological 4-manifold $X$ with intersection form $-E_8$; $\chi(X) = 10$.

The connected sum $X\#5(S^1\times S^3)$ has Euler characteristic 0, by Mike's computation, and the intersection form is still $-E_8$. Hence, by Donaldson's theorem, $X\#5(S^1\times S^3)$ does not have a smooth structure, since its intersection form is negative definite but not diagonal.

  • $\begingroup$ Nice answer, Marco--I simultaneously wrote the same thing! $\endgroup$ Sep 27 '18 at 13:27
  • $\begingroup$ Likewise, Danny! :) $\endgroup$ Sep 27 '18 at 13:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Speaking of ignorance from Freedman's work (something I should one day remedy), is the construction of the contractible manifold bounding the Poincare sphere significantly easier than the full power of his 1982 JDG paper? $\endgroup$
    – mme
    Sep 27 '18 at 13:30
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The hardest part of all of those theorems is finding a disk inside a Casson handle (plus Casson's original work putting Casson handles where you want disks.) After that, the other theorems about simply-connected manifolds require work, but the machinery was pretty well understood. $\endgroup$ Sep 28 '18 at 0:50

You can also get this from Donaldson's theorem by a similar device. Take a non-diagonalizable definite form with even rank $2n$, and realize it (Freedman again) by a simply connected manifold. Then $W\ \#\ (n+1) (S^1 \times S^3)$ is not smoothable and has Euler characteristic $0$. The argument is that if it were smoothable, then you could surger away the fundamental group and realize that intersection form by a simply connected manifold.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.