5
$\begingroup$

Let $K(G,n)$ be the Eilenberg Maclane space.

Consider the map from $$ K(\mathbb{Z}_2,1) \to K(\mathbb{Z}_4,1) \overset{f}{\to} K(\mathbb{Z}_2,1)\overset{g}{\to}K(\mathbb{Z}_2,2) \to \dots, $$

It looks that we can represent the map from $K(\mathbb{Z}_2,1)\to K(\mathbb{Z}_2,2)$ relating to the generator of cohomology group $$ q \in H^2(K(\mathbb{Z}_2,1),\mathbb{Z}_2)=H^2(B\mathbb{Z}_2,\mathbb{Z}_2)=\mathbb{Z}_2. $$

Say $$ p \in H^1(K(\mathbb{Z}_2,1),\mathbb{Z}_2)=H^1(B\mathbb{Z}_2,\mathbb{Z}_2)=\mathbb{Z}_2, $$ then $q$ and $p$ are group cocycles related by $$ q = p \cup p. $$

  1. Roughly, say due to the exact sequence above, we may say the kernel (in $K(\mathbb{Z}_2,1)$) of the map $g$, such that $$ q = p \cup p =0, $$ matches the image (in $K(\mathbb{Z}_2,1)$) of $$ f. $$

  2. Can we see explicitly that $q = p \cup p$ may be non-zero in $H^2(K(\mathbb{Z}_2,1),\mathbb{Z}_2)=H^2(B\mathbb{Z}_2,\mathbb{Z}_2)=\mathbb{Z}_2$, but $q =0$ when we pull back via $f$ from the $K(\mathbb{Z}_2,1)$ to $K(\mathbb{Z}_4,1)$? Can this be demonstrated explicitly at the level of group cocycle?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

Represent $p$ by the identity map $id: \mathbb{Z}_2 \to \mathbb{Z}_2$. Then $(p\cup p)(a,b) = p(a)p(b)$ is non-zero only on the 2-chain $(1,1)$. Namely, as a polynomial mod 2, $(p\cup p)(a,b) = ab$. When lifted to $\mathbb{Z}_4$, we get $p\cup p(a,b)=ab \mod 2$. Consider the function $\gamma: \mathbb{Z}_4\to \mathbb{Z}_2$ defined by $\gamma(x) = \frac{x^2-x}{2} \mod{2}$, namely $\gamma(0)=0,\gamma(1)=0,\gamma(2)=1,\gamma(3)=1$. Then $$d\gamma(x,y)=\gamma(x+y)-\gamma(x)-\gamma(y)=xy,$$ by $(x+y)^2-x^2-y^2 + (x +y)-x-y=2xy$. Note that $\gamma$ is really well defined because always $x^2 \equiv x \mod 2$ and you can see that if you add a multiple of $4$ to $x$ it don't changes the residue mod $2$ of the answer. So $d\gamma = p\cup p$ in $C^2(\mathbb{Z}_4,\mathbb{Z}_2)$.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @S. carmeli I change your $g$ to $\gamma$ due to that $g$ was usef in OP differently, then also correct $d\gamma(x,y)=\gamma(x+y)-\gamma(x)-\gamma(y)=xy,$ please see whether it maintains your meanings $\endgroup$
    – wonderich
    Sep 24, 2018 at 14:57
  • $\begingroup$ Can you provide me a hint how do you obtain this answer and the idea behind it? $\endgroup$ Sep 24, 2018 at 15:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I guess the point here is that polynomial functions on $\mathbb{Z}/4$ has the bad property that they preserve equivalences mod $2$. This means that in order to obtain new relations you need non-polynomial functions, and the simplest example is a polynomial that is always even for non trivial reason, divided by 2. So you can consider it as a usage of the fact that the binomial ${n\choose 2}$ is always an integer! $\endgroup$
    – S. carmeli
    Sep 24, 2018 at 16:09
  • $\begingroup$ I just post a new question, may be you also knew the answer - see the link. $\endgroup$ Sep 24, 2018 at 22:05
  • $\begingroup$ @wonderich its fine. $\endgroup$
    – S. carmeli
    Sep 25, 2018 at 7:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.