5
$\begingroup$

The Wikipedia universal enveloping algebra suggest a way to obtain higher Casimir operators (e.g. generators of the center of $\mathfrak{U(g)}$ for $\mathfrak{g}$ semisimple) by evaluating certain determinant:

$$ \det\, (t\mathrm{I} - \mathrm{ad}_X) = \sum_{i=0}^{\dim \mathfrak{g}} p_i(X) t^i $$

However if one does that for $\mathfrak{sl}_3$ then the resulting polynomial has only degrees (in $t$) 0,1,2,4,6,8 and it's coefficients seem to be just powers of the quadratic Casimir operator. If one tries to do the same for the defining representation $\mathbb{C}^3$ (replacing $\mathrm{ad}_X$ by $\rho(X)$ in the above formula) then one obtains quadratic as well as cubic invariant polynomials.

In the proof of Harish-Chandra isomorphism as presented e.g. in (1) there is construction of elements of $Z(\mathfrak{U(g)}$ using traces of matrices from representations of $\mathfrak{g}$. Something like $$ \sum\mathrm{tr}(\rho(X_{i_1})\rho(X_{i_2})\ldots \rho(X_{i_n}))X_{i_1}^*X_{i_2}^*\ldots X_{i_n}^* $$ where $X_i$ form basis for $\mathfrak{g}$ and $X_i^*$ form dual basis with respect to Killing form.

Q1: What is going on here?

Q2: Is it true that for a semi-simple complex Lie algebra and it's smallest nontrivial representation one obtains in this way all generators of the $Z(\mathfrak{U(g)}$?

Q3: Does the approach through determinant give the same operators that appear in the proof of the H-Ch isomorphism?

(1) Cohomological Induction and Unitary Representations by Knapp, Vogan

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

For $\mathfrak{sl}(3)$ the coefficients are not powers of the Casimir, though the polynomial is one in the square of $t$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ To be completely honest we haven't tried all coefficients but we checked that the highest degree $p_i$ is indeed a power of Casimir. I've checked again and I discovered I've missed linear term that is there. But all the other odd degrees of $t$ are missing. $\endgroup$ – Vít Tuček Sep 18 '18 at 17:15
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Does "the polynomial is one in the square of $t$" mean "the polynomial has non-$0$ terms only in even degrees"? $\endgroup$ – LSpice Sep 18 '18 at 19:38
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that is what I meant $\endgroup$ – Venkataramana Sep 18 '18 at 23:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LSpice Thank you for the editing. The typos were too many! $\endgroup$ – Venkataramana Sep 18 '18 at 23:56
  • $\begingroup$ The coefficients are naturally elements of $\mathcal S(\mathfrak g^*)$ (and not $\mathcal U(\mathfrak g^*)$). If you symmetrize the coefficient of $t^6$ and evaluate it at the dual basis, you obtain the quadratic Casimir. However, the cubic one is missing, since the coefficient of $t^5$ is $0$. There is a non-zero coefficient next to $t$ (which is of degree $7$), so cubic Casimir might be hidden there? $\endgroup$ – Ennar Sep 19 '18 at 1:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.