The Galois cohomology group $H^1(\mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z})$ classifies cyclic cubic extensions $K/\mathbb{Q}$ (specifically: the non-trivial elements correspond to Galois cubic field extensions $K/\mathbb{Q}$ together with a choice of isomorphism $\mathrm{Gal}(K/\mathbb{Q}) \cong \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$).

Let $k = \mathbb{Q}(\mu_3)$. There are restriction and corestriction maps $$\mathrm{Res}: H^1(\mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}) \to H^1(k, \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}), \quad \mathrm{Cores}: H^1(k, \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}) \to H^1(\mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}).$$ Restriction followed by corestriction is multiplication by $2$ on $H^1(\mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z})$. As each element is $3$-torsion, it follows that $\mathrm{Res}$ is injective and that $\mathrm{Cores}$ is surjective.

But as $\mu_3 \subset k$, it follows from Kummer theory that $$H^1(k, \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}) \cong H^1(k, \mu_3) \cong k^*/k^{*3}.$$ Composing with corestriction, we therefore obtain a surjective map $$f: k^{*}/k^{*3} \to H^1(\mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}).$$

Can the map $f$ be made explicit? Namely, given a non-cube $a \in k^*$, what is the cyclic cubic extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ induced by $f$?

I know that the corestriction $H^1(k, \mu_3) \cong k^*/k^{3*} \to \mathbb{Q}^*/\mathbb{Q}^{*3} \cong H^1(\mathbb{Q}, \mu_3)$ is just usual norm map. But this doesn't seem to help here.


1 Answer 1


It's just the map

$$x \mapsto y = \frac{x}{x^{\sigma}},$$

where the corresponding degree three extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ is the degree three subfield of $k(y^{1/3})$. The point is that it is obvious from the restriction map that

$$H^1(\mathbb{Q},\mathbb{Z}/3 \mathbb{Z}) = (k^{\times}/k^{\times 3})^{G = {\chi}},$$

where $\chi$ is the non-trivial character of $G = \mathrm{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_3)/\mathbb{Q}) = \mathbb{Z}/2 \mathbb{Z}$.

(Added Here $M^{\chi}$ means what is says on the tin. If $\sigma \in G$ and $m \in M^{\chi}$, then $\sigma m = \chi(\sigma) m$.)

And basic Kummer theory also says that degree 3 cyclic extensions $K$ of $\mathbb{Q}$ have the form $K(\zeta_3) = \mathbb{Q}(\zeta_3)(\alpha^{1/3})$ where

$$\sigma \alpha = \alpha^{-1} \mod k^{\times}/k^{\times 3}.$$

The same basic structure holds mutatis mutandis with $\mathbb{Q}$ replaced by any number field $F$, and $3$ replaced by $p$, and $G = \chi$ where now $\chi$ is the mod-p cyclotomic character of $G = \mathrm{Gal}(F(\zeta_p)/F)$, which is the canonical (possibly trivial) map $G \rightarrow (\mathbb{Z}/p \mathbb{Z})^{\times}$. And now the map from $k^{\times}/k^{\times p}$ is just the projection to the $\chi$-eigenspace.

Added: If you want an explicit polynomial, you can, of course, use Galois theory to do so. In fact, everything in this question one can (and I do) teach in the introductory undergraduate Galois theory course. To spell out the elementary details, you want an element of $k(y^{1/3})$ which is fixed by the order two element $\sigma \in \mathrm{Gal}(k(y^{1/3})/\mathbb{Q})$ (there is an obvious splitting from $\mathrm{Gal}(k/\mathbb{Q}) \rightarrow \mathrm{Gal}(k(y^{1/3}/\mathbb{Q})$). The obvious element to take is thus

$$z = y^{1/3} + \sigma y^{1/3} = y^{1/3} + y^{-1/3},$$

which is a root of

$$T^3 - 3 T - (y + y^{-1}) = T^3 - 3 T - \left(\frac{x}{x^{\sigma}} + \frac{x^{\sigma}}{x}\right) = T^3 - 3 T - \frac{Tr(x^2)}{N(x)} \in \mathbb{Q}[T].$$

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer, which I'm currently trying to digest. Can you please clarify what you mean by the notation $(k^*/k^{*3})^{G = \chi}$? Do you mean the set of elements which are invariant under the action of the Galois group $G$? If so, why is this those elements $\alpha$ with $\sigma \alpha \equiv \alpha^{-1} \bmod k^{*3}$, and not $\sigma \alpha \equiv \alpha \bmod k^{*3}$? (I assume that $\sigma$ denotes the non-trivial element of $G$?). $\endgroup$ Sep 18, 2018 at 16:06
  • $\begingroup$ I was also hoping for an explicit polynomial of degree $3$ which defines the cyclic cubic extension of $\mathbb{Q}$. Does your method give this? $\endgroup$ Sep 18, 2018 at 16:06
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the extra details. You have defined what $M^{\chi}$ is, but I still don't understand what the notation $M^{G = \chi}$ means. Normally $M^G$ denotes the $G$-invariants for a module with $G$ action, but it seems that you mean something else. $\endgroup$ Sep 18, 2018 at 18:07
  • $\begingroup$ Whilst I appreciate the answer, I don't think I can accept it until the notation is clarified and also it is clarified why $\alpha^{-1}$ appears, rather than $\alpha$. $\endgroup$ Sep 19, 2018 at 21:17
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @DanielLoughran Going from the name, she probably teaches at Hogwarts. And Pound Sterling must be the reincarnation of quid. $\endgroup$ Sep 21, 2018 at 5:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.