A spectral triple $({\cal A},{\cal H},D)$ consists of a unital $*$-algebra ${\cal A}$ represented as bounded operators on a Hilbert space ${\cal H}$, together with an unbounded operator $D$ having compact reslovent and such that the operator $[D,a]$ is bounded, for all $a \in {\cal A}$.

Roughly speaking, when ${\cal A}$ is commutative, then such objects correspond to compact Riemannian spin manifolds, with ${\cal H}$ reducing to the square integrable spinors, ${\cal A}$ the smooth functions, and $D$ the Dirac operator.

Motivated by the commutative picture, people seem to usually work with spectral triples such that ${\cal H}$ is separable. But the definition seems to make perfect sense without this assumption. Is there anything that goes seriously wrong, or becomes much more difficult, when one passes from the separable to the non-separable situation.

New contributor
Dave Shulman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.

Your Answer

Dave Shulman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
 
discard

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.