8
$\begingroup$

The definition of a monoidal model category requires that the tensor product is biclosed (such is needed to ensure that the tensor product is derivable in both variables). Obviously, in the situation of relative categories and simplicial categories, which we know model all $\infty$-categories, we can't really pull this off.

So a few questions:

What explicit data, if any, give $E_1$-monoidal structures on simplicial and relative categories?

Given an actual monoidal model category $M$, an on-the-nose braiding satisfying the strict coherences gives $M$ an $E_2$ monoidal structure. Are all $E_2$ enhancements represented by strict braidings?

More generally, can we say that a monoidal model category $M$ is $E_n$ monoidal by demanding that particular explicit function complexes are $n$-connected?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Regarding the last question, it sounds fishy to ask that $E_n$-ness be equivalent to a connectedness condition, since $E_n$-ness is generally a structure rather than a property. But perhaps with enough strictness it becomes a property... $\endgroup$ – Tim Campion Sep 13 '18 at 7:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.