4
$\begingroup$

Definition. A closed subset $S$ of a topological space $X$ is called a separator between points $x,y\in X\setminus S$ if the points $x$ and $y$ belong to different connected components of $X\setminus S$. A separator $S$ is called an irreducible separator between $x$ and $y$ is $S$ coincides with each closed separator between $x$ and $y$ that is contained in $S$.

Using Kuratowski-Zorn Lemma it is easy to prove that each closed separator in a locally path-connected (or more generally locally continuum-connected) space contains a closed irreducible separator. Is the case result true without the local path connectedness?

Question. Does each closed separator between two points $a,b$ of a metrizable continuum contain an irreducible closed separator between $a$ and $b$?

I hope that the answer to this question should be know but somehow I cannot find in the books of Kuratowski and Nadler.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

No. Consider the subset $X$ of $\mathbb{R}^2$ consisting of the union of line segments beginning at $(0,0)$ and ending at $(1,2^{-n})$ for $n\geq 0$ or $(1,0)$. Let $x=(0,0)$ and $y=(1,0)$ and consider the separator $S$ consisting of points of the form $(\frac{1}{2},2^{-n-1})$ or $(\frac{1}{2},0)$. I claim that $S$ is a separator between $x$ and $y$ with no irreducible sub-separator. Clearly $S$ is a separator between $x$ and $y$ since $X\setminus S$ can be partitioned into two relatively clopen sets containing $x$ and $y$. To see that $S$ has no irreducible sub-separator, note that first any set $S^\prime \subseteq S$ that separates $x$ and $y$ must contain the point $(\frac{1}{2},0)$, otherwise the line segment between $(0,0)$ and $(1,0)$ connects $x$ and $y$. Furthermore notice that for any $S^\prime \subseteq S$ that is a separator between $x$ and $y$ and for any point $z$ of the form $(\frac{1}{2},2^{-n-1})$, $S^\prime \setminus \{z\}$ is also a separator between $x$ and $y$. This implies that the only subset of $S$ that can possibly be an irreducible separator is the singleton $\{(\frac{1}{2},0)\}$, but $X \setminus \{(\frac{1}{2},0)\}$ is connected. Therefore $S$ has no irreducible sub-separator.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ $(0,1)$ should be $(1,0)$, twice - right? $\endgroup$
    – GNiklasch
    Sep 4, 2018 at 16:54
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. Thank you for pointing that out. $\endgroup$ Sep 4, 2018 at 16:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.