3
$\begingroup$

According to Bohr, the definition of the almost periodic function is: A function $f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ is called almost periodic if it is continuous and if for every positive $\epsilon$, there exists a positive number $l$ such that every closed interval of length $l$ contains an $\epsilon$-almost period.

Intuitively, when $\epsilon$ is getting smaller, the corresponding $l$ is getting larger. But is this always correct? If it is correct, may I ask how to prove it? Also, is there any relation between $\epsilon$ and the corresponding $\epsilon$-almost period?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ To complete @Nik Weaver answer, I think that it is easy to show that there exists some $\epsilon_0$ such that $l$ is the same for all $0 < \epsilon <\epsilon_0$ (i.e. $l$ does not increase as $\epsilon$ decreases) if and only if $f$ is periodic. $\endgroup$
    – Nick S
    Jun 24 '20 at 18:01
6
$\begingroup$

It seems to me that if an interval is an $\epsilon$-almost period then it is trivially an $\epsilon'$-almost period for any $\epsilon' >\epsilon$. So as $\epsilon$ gets smaller the set of intervals which contain $\epsilon$-almost periods shrinks (i.e., fewer intervals have this property).

As to the second question, consider the function $\sum_1^\infty 2^{-n} e^{ib_nx}$ where $(b_n)$ is any sequence going to infinity. In order to contain a $2^{-n}$-almost period you'll need length on the order of $b_n$. So there's no upper bound on the length of the intervals as a function of $\epsilon$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ (The series should be $\sum 2^{-n}e^{ix/b_n}$.) $\endgroup$
    – Nik Weaver
    Aug 30 '18 at 15:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.