On a compact five-manifold, the Stiefel-Whitney number $w_2w_3$ can be nonzero. An example is the manifold $SU(3)/SO(3)$, and also another example is a $\mathbb{CP}^2$ bundle over a circle where the holonomy is given by the complex conjugation automorphism of $\mathbb{CP}^2$.

My question is whether the Stiefel-Whitney number $w_1^2w_3$ can be nonzero on a compact five-manifold. I haven't found either a simple proof that it is zero, or a simple example where it is nonzero.

Recall that on a closed $n$-manifold $M$, there is a unique class $\nu_k$ such that $\operatorname{Sq}^k(x) = \nu_kx$ for all $x \in H^{n-k}(M; \mathbb{Z}_2)$; this is called the $k^{\text{th}}$ Wu class. The Wu classes can always be written in terms of Stiefel-Whitney classes due to Wu's theorem which states that $w = \operatorname{Sq}(\nu)$.

The first Wu class $\nu_1$ is $w_1$, so $\operatorname{Sq}^1(x) = w_1x$ for all $x \in H^4(M; \mathbb{Z}_2)$ where $M$ is a closed five-manifold. Now, by the Wu formula, we have $\operatorname{Sq}^1(w_3) = w_1w_3$. So $$w_1^2w_3 = \operatorname{Sq}^1(w_1w_3) = \operatorname{Sq}^1(\operatorname{Sq}^1(w_3)) = 0$$ as $\operatorname{Sq}^1\circ\operatorname{Sq}^1 = 0$ by the Ádem relations.

In fact, $w_2w_3$ is the only Stiefel-Whitney number which can be non-zero and therefore defines an isomorphism $w_2w_3 : \Omega_5^O \to \mathbb{Z}_2$. To see this, note that the Stiefel-Whitney numbers of a closed five-manifold are $$w_1^5, w_1^3w_2, w_1^2w_3, w_1w_4, w_1w_2^2, w_2w_3, w_5.$$

It has already been established that $w_1^2w_3 = 0$ and $w_2w_3$ can be non-zero. Note that $w_5 = 0$ as it is the mod $2$ reduction of the Euler characteristic.

One of the properties of Steenrod squares is that $\operatorname{Sq}^k(x) = 0$ if $k > \deg x$. In particular, if we consider $\operatorname{Sq}^k : H^{n-k}(M;\mathbb{Z}_2) \to H^n(M; \mathbb{Z}_2)$, we see that if $k > n - k$ (i.e. $k > \frac{n}{2}$), it must be the zero map and hence by Poincaré duality, we must have $\nu_k = 0$. So on a five-manifold, $\nu_3$, $\nu_4$, and $\nu_5$ must be zero. As is shown here, we have

\begin{align*} \nu_3 &= w_1w_2\\ \nu_4 &= w_4 + w_1w_3 + w_2^2 + w_1^4\\ \nu_5 &= w_1w_4 + w_1^2w_3 + w_1w_2^2 + w_1^3w_2. \end{align*}

As $\nu_3 = w_1w_2 = 0$, we have $w_1^3w_2 = 0$ and $w_1w_2^2 = 0$.

Now note that $\nu_5 = w_1w_4 + w_1^2w_3 + w_1w_2^2 + w_1^3w_2 = w_1w_4$ so $w_1w_4 = 0$.

Finally, as $\nu_4$ is zero, so is $w_1\nu_4 = w_1w_4 + w_1^2w_3 + w_1w_2^2 + w_1^5 = w_1^5$.

Your Answer

 
discard

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.