2
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a set and ${\cal P}(X)$ its powerset. We say that ${\cal F} \subseteq {\cal P}(X)$ has the splitting property (SP) if there is $A\in {\cal P}(X)$ such that for all $F\in {\cal F}$ we have $$F \cap A \neq \emptyset \neq F\cap (X\setminus A).$$

Let $\text{SP}(X)$ denote the collection of all subsets of ${\cal P}(X)$ with (SP), and we order it with $\subseteq$.

If $X$ is infinite, and ${\cal F}\in \text{SP}(X)$, is there ${\cal M}\in\text{SP}(X)$ such that ${\cal M}$ is maximal in $(\text{SP}(X),\subseteq)$ and ${\cal F}\subseteq {\cal M}$?

(The obvious tool to try to use, Zorn's Lemma seems to be of no help in this, but I might be wrong.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You could just say that $\mathcal F$ is $2$-colorable, i.e., the hypergraph $(X,\mathcal F)$ has chromatic number $\le2.$ $\endgroup$ – bof Aug 13 '18 at 11:46
5
$\begingroup$

Yes, any family of subsets of $X$ with the splitting property can be extended to a maximal such family. The axiom of choice is not needed for this.

Suppose $\mathcal F\in \operatorname{SP}(X),$ and let $A\in\mathcal P(X)$ be such that for all $F\in\mathcal F$ we have $$F\cap A\ne\emptyset\ne F\cap(X\setminus A).$$

We may assume that $\mathcal F\ne\emptyset,$ so that $\emptyset\ne A\ne X.$ Now it is easy to see that the set $$\mathcal M=\{F\in\mathcal P(X):F\cap A\ne\emptyset\ne F\cap(X\setminus A)\}$$ has the desired properties.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.