Definition of algebraic de Rham cohomology of non-smooth affine variety $\newcommand{\Hdr}{H_{\mathrm{dRh}}}$
$\newcommand{\spec}[1]{\mathrm{spec}(#1)}$
$\require{amsmath}$
Let $A = k[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$ the polynomial ring over a field $k$ of characteristic zero and $I \subseteq A$ an ideal of $A$. Let 
$Y= V(I) = \spec{A/I}$ and $X = \spec{A}$.
According to R. Hartshorne,
On the de Rham cohomology of algebraic varieties,
Publications mathématiques de l’I.H.É.S., tome 45 (1975), p. 5-99
the algebraic de Rham cohomology of $Y$ is defined as follows:
Let $\hat{X}$ be the ringed space with $Y$ as a topological space and the sheaf derived from $\varprojlim_r A/I^r = \hat{A}$ as structure sheaf. Additionally let $\widehat{\Omega_X^\bullet}$ be the completion of $\Omega_{X|k}^\bullet$ (the exterior powers of the ordinary Kähler-differentials) at $I$, so that $\widehat{\Omega_X^\bullet} = \Omega_{X|k}^\bullet \otimes_A \hat{A}$. The exterior derivative extends to $d^p:\widehat{\Omega_X^p} \to \widehat{\Omega_X^{p+1}}$.
Now Hartshorne defines 
$$\Hdr^p(Y) = \mathbb{H}^p(\hat{X}, \widehat{\Omega_X^\bullet})$$
with $\mathbb{H}$ standing for the hypercohomology.
If $Y$ is a smooth $k$-scheme, then by Hartshorne's Proposition 1.1, one can replace $X$ by $Y$ and get 
$$(*) \quad \quad \Hdr^p(Y) = \mathbb{H}^p(Y, \Omega_{Y|k}^\bullet) = H^p(Y, \Omega_{Y|k}^\bullet)$$
where $\Omega_{Y|k}^\bullet$ is the complex of exterior powers of the ordinary Kähler-differentials of $Y/k$ and at the right stands ordinary cohomology, because of affine-ness of the situtation.
QUESTION: Does this equality (*) still hold, when $Y$ is no longer a smooth scheme over $k$? 
The answers to 
algebraic de Rham cohomology of singular varieties
seem to suppose so, but I could not find a proof by searching with google or on my own.
 A: (Synthesis of answers from comments, posted as community-wiki answer for convenience.)


*

*If $k = \mathbb{C}$ then algebraic de Rham cohomology, defined a la Hartshorne using the completion of $X$ along $Y$, is always isomorphic to singular cohomology. This is a theorem of Hartshorne, stated as Theorem 1.6 of his 1972 Manuscripta Math survey article Algebraic de Rham cohomology, and the proof is in Chapter IV of his 1975 PMIHES paper On the de Rham cohomology of algebraic varieties.

*There are examples, as in this question, of (non-smooth) affine $\mathbb{C}$-varieties $Y$ for which the "naive de Rham cohomology" $\mathbb{H}^\bullet(Y, \Omega^\bullet_Y)$ does not agree with singular cohomology. The Arapura--Kang curve $x^5 + y^5 + x^2 y^2 = 0$ is one such example.

*Hence the Arapura--Kang curve, or any other example as in (2), must also be an example where naive de Rham cohomology disagrees with Hartshorne's definition. 
In particular, when this question uses the notation $H^\bullet_{\mathrm{dR}}(Y)$ to mean $\mathbb{H}^\bullet(Y, \Omega^\bullet_Y)$, this is misleading and non-standard, since this definition is not equivalent to the standard definition due to Hartshorne.
