Let $(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ be a complex analytic space in the sense of Grauert, i.e., a $\mathbb{C}$-analytic ringed space which is locally isomorphic to a local model. We may assume that $X$ is a complex manifold for our purposes here.

Let $\mathcal{O}_X$ denote the sheaf of analytic functions on $X$ and $\mathcal{O}_X^{\ast}$ denote the associated multiplicative sheaf. For each $x \in X$, we define a morphism on stalks $\exp : \mathcal{O}_{X,x} \longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_{X,x}^{\ast}$ which assigns to each analytic function $f \in \mathcal{O}_{X,x}$ the non-zero analytic function $\exp(f)\in \mathcal{O}_{X,x}^{\ast}$.

Claim: $\ker(\exp) = 2\pi i \mathbb{Z}$, where $\mathbb{Z}$ is the stalk of the constant sheaf at $x$. The subscript $x$ is omitted for obvious reasons.

It is obvious that $2\pi i \mathbb{Z} \subset \ker \exp$,but it is not immediate that the reverse inclusion is also true. A standard argument, which can be found in Kaup and Kaup's text on several complex variables is of the following form:

For $f \in \ker(\exp)$, assume that $f(x) =0$. Expanding $\exp(z)$ into a power series centered at $x$, we obtained a stalk $g_x \in \mathcal{O}_{X,x}$ such that $\exp(f) = 1 +f - g f^2$. Since $\exp(f) =1$, it follows by induction that $$f = f^2 g = \cdots = f^{j+1} g^j \in \bigcap_{j=1}^{\infty} \mathfrak{m}_x^j = (0),$$ where the last line follows from elementary properties of analytic algebras and $\mathfrak{m}_x$ denotes the maximal ideal of the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{X,x}$. Explicitly, $\mathfrak{m}_x = \{ \varphi \in \mathcal{O}_{X,x} : f(x) =0 \}$.

I am curious as to whether anyone is aware of other ways of proving this result, perhaps in a more analytic or geometric manner?

  • 7
    $\begingroup$ I don't get it. If $\exp(f)=1$ on a connected open subset of $X$, $f$ is constant. $\endgroup$ – abx Jul 10 '18 at 6:19
  • $\begingroup$ @abx Does the identity theorem hold on general complex analytic spaces? (possibly non-reduced). $\endgroup$ – AmorFati Jul 10 '18 at 23:03

Let $f\in\ker(\exp)$; by definition: \begin{equation} \forall x\in X,\,\exp_x(f_x)=1\in\mathcal{O}_{X,x}^{\times}, \end{equation} in other words: \begin{equation} \exp_x(f_x)=\exp_x(Re(f_x))[\cos(Im(f_x))+i\sin(Im(f_x))]=1\Rightarrow\\ \Rightarrow f_x=2k\pi i\,\text{for some}\,k\in\mathbb{Z}. \end{equation} By definition of stalks: there exists an open neighbourhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f_{|U}=2k\pi i$, that is $f$ is locally constant to value $2k\pi i$ for some $k\in\mathbb{Z}$.

So: \begin{equation} \forall x\in X,\,\ker(\exp)_x\subseteq2\pi i\mathbb{Z}_x, \end{equation} by previous reasoning: $\ker(\exp)=2\pi i\mathbb{Z}$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.