The well known Dirichlet's unit theorem states that the unit group of a maximal order in a quadratic number field is finitely generated of rank blah blah blah. I think it's pretty naive to expect a most radical generalization to hold, namely:

Generalized Dirichlet unit theorem. The unit group of an associative unital ring with finitely generated additive group is finitely generated.

Is there any concrete counterexample?

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ It's even finitely presented. Because it's an arithmetic group. I'll post details later. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Jul 5, 2018 at 20:44
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Related: Kahn proved that if $X$ is a reduced scheme of finite type over $\operatorname{Spec} \mathbb Z$, then $\Gamma(X,\mathcal O_X)$ is finitely generated. He gives counterexamples if the reducedness assumption is dropped (e.g. $\mathbb Z[x][\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2)$), but those are not finite over $\operatorname{Spec} \mathbb Z$ (only of finite type). See Bruno Kahn, Sur le groupe des classes d'un schéma arithmétique. $\endgroup$ Jul 5, 2018 at 21:01
  • $\begingroup$ In this case when the underlying abelian group is torsion-free it yields a complete argument (in this setting Borel-Harish-Chandra is enough; Kahn probably relies on it in general). Possibly there's some additional argument needed to tackle the case with torsion. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Jul 5, 2018 at 22:38
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ If you were already aware of the use of B-HC in this question (and thus the torsion-free case) it would have been useful to mention it from the beginning. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Jul 6, 2018 at 8:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2445562/… $\endgroup$ Jul 7, 2018 at 8:44

2 Answers 2


Let $A$ be a ring that is finitely generated as an abelian group. Let $I$ be the subgroup of torsion elements. By finite generation, $I$ is finite. On the other hand, $I$ is a two-sided ideal of $A$, and $A/I$ is a ring that is torsion-free as an abelian group. By Borel and Harish-Chandra, $(A/I)^\times$ is finitely-generated. Since $I$ is finite, the map $A^\times \to (A/I)^\times$ is an isogeny (i.e. has finite kernel and cokernel, see Theorem 1.3 in this paper), and therefore $A^\times$ is finitely generated.

  • $\begingroup$ Great. Rather it's Lemma 3.6 in this paper that we need (the general case makes use of it). It says that if $A\to B$ is a surjective ring homomorphism with finite kernel, then the group homomorphism $A^\times\to B^\times$ is also surjective (clearly it has finite kernel). $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Jul 6, 2018 at 11:23
  • $\begingroup$ @YCor Yes, you are right. I think the general case is worth knowing about, so I will leave the reference like this if you don't mind! $\endgroup$
    – Aurel
    Jul 6, 2018 at 11:27
  • $\begingroup$ I'd be curious how the assumption that $I$ is finite can be relaxed (for the surjectivity statement). At least, $I$ of finite length as left $A$-module is enough? $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Jul 6, 2018 at 12:54
  • $\begingroup$ Not sure what the weakest assumption possible is. I don't have time to think about it now, but I will ask Alex if he has an idea. $\endgroup$
    – Aurel
    Jul 6, 2018 at 17:41
  • $\begingroup$ May I ask someone to be more specific about which bit of the work of Borel and Harish-Chandra is being applied in the comment of @YCor and in this answer? $\endgroup$
    – Lee Mosher
    Jul 12, 2018 at 18:36

At Lee Mosher's request, here is how Borel-Harish-Chandra is applied, which is the bulk of the argument (with some additional work in the case with torsion as described in Aurel's post).

Let $A$ be a finitely generated (associative unital) ring whose underlying additive group is free abelian of finite rank. From left multiplication we get a representation of $A$ on $B=A\otimes_\mathbf{Z}\mathbf{R}$, and thus an injective ring homomorphism $i:A\to M=\mathrm{End}(B)\simeq M_d(\mathbf{R})$, where $\mathrm{End}$ means as real vector space; it maps into $E=E(\mathbf{R})$, the set of endomorphisms as algebra.

Inside $E\times E$, consider the set $G$ of pairs $(x,y)$ such that $xy=1$. This is a Zariski closed submonoid of $E\times E$, and can be identified to the automorphism group of $B$; it lies inside $M_{2d}(\mathbf{R})$. For $x\in A^\times$, consider $j(x)=(x,x^{1})$. Then the group homomorphism $j$ maps injectively $A^\times$ into $G(\mathbf{Z})$. We claim that this is surjective. Indeed, consider $(x,y)\in E(\mathbf{Z})\times E(\mathbf{Z})$ with $xy=1$. Then $x$ preserves the lattice of integral points, i.e., $x$ induces an automorphism of $A=B(\mathbf{Z})$. [Note: we had to introduce $E\times E$ instead of $E$ to describe $G$ as a closed subgroup, which is necessary to apply Borel-Harish-Chandra.]

Thus we have $A\simeq G(\mathbf{Z})$. Borel and Harish-Chandra precisely proved (Annals of Math, 1962) that $G(\mathbf{Z})$ is finitely generated (and even finitely presented, as mentioned in Borel's ICM proceeding of 1962) for every $\mathbf{Q}$-defined subgroup of $\mathrm{GL}_k$.

[Remark: $G(\mathbf{Z})$ is possibly not a lattice in $G(\mathbf{R})$; however $G(\mathbf{Z})=H(\mathbf{Z})$ for some $\mathbf{Q}$-defined normal subgroup $H$ of $G$, such that $G^0/H^0$ is a $\mathbf{Q}$-split torus, and $H(\mathbf{Z})$ is a lattice in $H(\mathbf{R})$.]

  • $\begingroup$ (Note: it's rather a Zariski-closed submonoid of $E\times E^{\mathrm{op}}$, but this does not matter) $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Jul 13, 2018 at 8:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.