I am reading Non-orientable 3-manifolds of small complexity (Topology and its Applications 133 (2003) pp 157-178, arXiv:math/0211092), by Amendola and Martinelli. In this work $\mathbb P^2$-irreducible complexity-6 manifolds are listed. There are five of them. I wonder about the following non-orientable manifolds.

  1. Take $S^2\times I$ and glue its top sphere to its bottom sphere with the antipodal homeomorphism or with a reflection in plane homeomorphism. Let's denote it by $S^2\widetilde\times S^1$.
  2. $\mathbb P^2\times S^1$

I assume that those two manifolds are not $\mathbb P^2$-irreducible. I don't know how to embed $\mathbb P^2$ into the first one. The preposition 1.3 on page 5 of the abovementioned work says that a Stiefel-Whitney surface cannot be a sphere. It seems to me that it is sphere for the first manifold.

Both of them have double cover $S^2\times S^1$, and the fundamental groups are $\mathbb Z$ and $\mathbb Z + \mathbb Z_2$. What are the fundamental groups of the five manifolds of complexity 6 in the above work?

At the same time I have the following additional questions about non-orientable 3-manifolds.

A. In case of surfaces we obtain every non-orientable one by the connected sum of an orientable one with $\mathbb RP^2$. Is there an analog in 3-manifolds? I.e. Is every non-orientable closed 3-manifold being connected sum of orientable one and $S^2\widetilde\times S^1$ ? (clarified on 2018-09-03)

B. A non-orientable surface with a removed disk is embeddable in $\mathbb R^3$. Can we embed a non-orientable $M^3$ with removed ball into $\mathbb R^4$ ?

C. Is the regular neighborhood of a loop changing orientation in a 3-manifold homeomorphic to a solid Klein bottle ?

EDIT 2018-07-08 I add following new question.

D. Each non-orientable surface is double covered by orientable one. We can ask whether every 3-manifold with infinite fundamental group is double cover of some non-orientable one.

The answer to my question A is negative but still it seems that we can somehow convert orientable manifold into non-orientable by attaching handle which change orientation. When Stiefel-Whitney surface is sphere then it is the case.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ (A) No. What you see in dimension 2 is a very special case. (B) No again. There are obstructions to embedding punctured 3-manifolds in $\mathbb R^4$, for example there is one using the torsion linking form. (C) The boundary of a regular neighbourhood, yes. The neighbourhood itself is the associated disc bundle to the Klein bottle. $\endgroup$ – Ryan Budney Jul 5 '18 at 14:55
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you again. At least we can sort irreducible non-orientable 3-manifolds by genus of Stiefel-Whitney surface. $\endgroup$ – Marek Mitros Jul 6 '18 at 6:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The notion of P2-irreducible contains in particular irreducible. So there are no non-trivial spheres. $\endgroup$ – Bruno Martelli Jul 6 '18 at 16:22
  • $\begingroup$ by a full Kleinbottle you mean solid Kleinbottle? $\endgroup$ – janmarqz Jul 9 '18 at 2:13
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry for my language. I mean $D^1\times D^2$ with top and bottom $D^2$ glued with reflection homeomorphism. I guess this is called "solid Klein bottle". $\endgroup$ – Marek Mitros Jul 9 '18 at 4:43

For question D, I think the answer is negative. Consider the semidirect product $\Lambda=\mathbf{Z}^2\rtimes_A\mathbf{Z}$, with $A=\begin{pmatrix}25 & 7\\ 7 & 2\end{pmatrix}$. This is the $\pi_1$ of some SOL-type closed 3-manifold.

This matrix is not a square in $\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbf{Z})$, by a naive computation (use that the centralizer consists of symmetric matrices, and there exist no integers $a,b,c$ such that $(a^2+b^2,b^2+c^2)=(25,2)$). In addition one checks that every element of order 2 in the normalizer of $\langle A\rangle$ in $\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbf{Z})$ is contained in $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbf{Z})$. Therefore, any subgroup of $\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbf{Z})$ containing $\langle A\rangle$ as subgroup of index 2 is contained in $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbf{Z})$. In addition, since the determinant of $A-I$ is $-25$, every subgroup of index $\le 5$ in $\Lambda$ contains $\mathbf{Z}^2$. Hence, if $\Gamma$ is a group containing $\Lambda$ as subgroup of index 2, then the intersection of subgroups of index $\le 4$ contains $\mathbf{Z}^2$, and taking the centralizer of its derived subgroup retrieves $\mathbf{Z}^2$, which is thus normal in the larger group $\Gamma$. The previous applies to the image of $\Gamma$ in $\Gamma/\mathbf{Z}^2$. So in case $\Gamma$ is torsion-free, the corresponding manifold is orientable.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. Can you explain me last sentence of your answer ? How "torsion-free" lead to orientability ? My understanding is that loop changing orientation is infinite order in fundamental group of 3-manifold. Someone answered me on stack exchange, that there are no finite order elements in fundamental group of prime 3-manifold with infinte fundamental group. $\endgroup$ – Marek Mitros Jul 9 '18 at 5:00
  • $\begingroup$ This manifold is the mapping torus of some orientation-preserving self-diffeomorphism of the torus (given by the given matrix). So it's indeed orientable. $\endgroup$ – YCor Sep 3 '18 at 15:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.