6
$\begingroup$

After contacting the arxiv recently about possibly adding semigroup theory as a subject class, they suggested I canvas the research community to establish whether such a subject class would be used and whether there's enough support available for moderation etc..

I have created an email address and website as an attempt to allow members of the semigroup community to indicate whether they would likely submit papers under the subject class were it created and/or indicate whether they are able to offer support for moderation etc.. The website is available at https://arxiv-semigroup-theory-class.gitlab.io with the email address listed on the website.

It would be excellent if people from the research community could consider their own commitments there and to possibly pass the url around with other members from the semigroup theory research community (probably better someone has this pointed out to them several times rather than not at all).

$\endgroup$
12
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ What would be the reason to start a new subject class? There are many active research areas that do not have their own subject class (e.g. arithmetic geometry, geometric analysis, and geometric group theory) where research is posted to a larger subject class (e.g. algebraic geometry or number theory; differential geometry or analysis of PDEs; and algebraic topology or group theory, respectively). There are usually reasons to keep it this way (e.g. backwards compatibility, audience size and make-up, etc). $\endgroup$ Jun 30, 2018 at 10:26
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ There isn't really an appropriate larger category to submit to, except maybe general mathematics (which I don't see as an ideal place to submit semigroup theory papers to) and I am pretty sure the current norm is to submit to something similar like group theory or combinatorics (my game theory paper was shoved in to combinatorics rather than cs and game theory, which is in my opinion a misclassification). $\endgroup$ Jun 30, 2018 at 10:27
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ An alternative could be to change the description of the subject class Group Theory to say explicitly something like 'Groups and group-like structures'. In any classification system, there is a trade-off between accuracy and usefulness. $\endgroup$ Jun 30, 2018 at 10:35
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If there was an algebra classification that could be used however there isn't one. Another option would be to propose an algebra subject classification rather than semigroup theory, however semigroup theory is similar in level with grouping to the other classifications rather than having things as general as alebgra/analysis as subject classes. $\endgroup$ Jun 30, 2018 at 10:35
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ The description at arxiv.org/archive/math includes “semigroups” under the subject class Rings and Algebras. $\endgroup$ Jun 30, 2018 at 11:06

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy