9
$\begingroup$

Has anyone seen the ring $\Lambda[x_0, x_1, x_2, \ldots]/(x_i x_j - (i+1) x_0 x_{i+j})$ in some natural context?

Here $\Lambda[x_0, x_1, x_2, \ldots]$ is the (graded-)commutative algebra (either over the integers or the integers localized at 2) freely generated by elements $x_0,x_1,x_2,\ldots$ of odd homological degrees, so that $x_i x_j = - x_j x_i$. In particular, we only get $2 x_i^2 = 0$, not $x_i^2 = 0$. I probably shouldn't write $\Lambda$ here: in characteristic $2$ or integrally, $\Lambda$ usually adds the relation $x_i^2 = 0$.

ADDED NOTE: In the meantime, I have found a better way of solving the problem in which this arose, so it is merely a curiosity now. I am happy to delete it if people wish.

Forgive me for posting this to 'Commutative algebra', but as a topologist, commutative means $x y = (-1)^{(\deg x)(\deg y)} yx$, and my $x_i$ are in odd degrees.

SECOND NOTE: This algebra has now shown up in another context, so Vladimir's answer below has been quite useful. Thanks to Vladimir and MO.

$\endgroup$
15
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I’ve edited the title, although the original was much better! Hope you don’t mind. $\endgroup$ Jun 28 '18 at 17:11
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @JeremyRickard, what is this? Commutativity for ants? $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Jun 28 '18 at 17:24
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I thought ants commute all the time (e.g. for food). $\endgroup$
    – M.G.
    Jun 28 '18 at 17:49
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ What exactly is $x_i x_j - \left(i+1\right) x_0 x_{i+j}$ quantified over? All pairs of nonnegative $i$ and $j$ ? Only those with $i < j$ ? $\endgroup$ Jun 28 '18 at 18:56
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ That is, it is still quite interesting as an Abelian group, but the multiplication is kind of boring. $\endgroup$
    – Vincent
    Jun 29 '18 at 8:14
6
$\begingroup$

I noticed this now, and I want to remark that the underlying abelian group can in fact be described very precisely. To do that, note that:

(1) the defining relations easily imply that the abelian group of elements of degree $d\ge 2$ in this algebra is certainly generated by $x_0^{d-1}x_k$, $k\ge 0$, and

(2) as discussed in the comments, there are the relations $(i+j+2)x_0x_{i+j}=0$ that follow from the defining relations and anticommutativity; effectively, these give just one relation for each $n$, namely $(n+2)x_0x_n=0$.

Now let me (inspired by typical Gröbner bases calculations) consider the following two chains of equalities: $$ x_ix_jx_k=(i+1)x_0x_{i+j}x_k=(i+1)(i+j+1)x_0^2x_{i+j+k} $$ and $$ x_ix_jx_k=(j+1)x_ix_0x_{j+k}=-(j+1)x_0x_ix_{j+k}=-(j+1)(i+1)x_0^2x_{i+j+k}. $$ They imply that $$ (i+1)(i+2j+2)x_0^2x_{i+j+k}=0 $$ for each choice of $i$ and $j$ with $i+j\le n$. In particular, if $n\ge 1$, we may take $i=n-1$, $j=1$, obtaining $$ n(n+3)x_0^2x_n=(n-1+1)(n-1+2+2)x_0^2x_n=0. $$ But $(n+2)x_0x_n=0$ implies $(n+1)(n+2)x_0^2x_n=0$, so by subtraction we see that $2x_0^2x_n=0$. Moreover, no further relations can be obtained in a similar way, because once we have the 2-torsion property, we have $$ (i+1)(i+2j+2)x_0^2x_n=(i+1)ix_0^2x_n=0, $$ since $(i+1)i$ is always even.

In fact, using a version of Gröbner bases (or rewriting systems) for ideals in free anticommutative algebras, one can see that the system of all the defining relations thus obtained, namely $$ \begin{cases} x_ix_j=(i+1)x_0x_{i+j},\\ (n+2)x_0x_n=0,\\ 2x_0^2x_n=0 \end{cases} $$ is complete, and so your ring as an abelian group :

is freely generated by $1$ in degree $0$,

is freely generated by $x_0,x_1,\ldots$ in degree $1$,

is the product of cyclic groups of orders $2,3,\ldots$ generated by $x_0^2, x_0x_1, x_0x_2, \ldots$ respectively in degree $2$,

is a product of countably many cyclic groups of order $2$ generated by $x_0^d, x_0^{d-1}x_1, x_0^{d-1}x_2, \ldots$ in each degree $d\ge 3$ .

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.