1
$\begingroup$

We say that a topological space $(X,\tau)$ is point-removal insensitive if for all $x\in X$ we have $X\cong X\setminus \{x\}$.

If $X,Y$ are point-removal insensitive, does this imply that $X\times Y$ with the product topology is point-removal insensitive?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe call these spaces "puncturable" or "holeable" (or "punctured"?). Just thinking out loud.. $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Jun 11 '18 at 22:16
  • $\begingroup$ You might look into Max Pitz's papers: arxiv.org/search/?searchtype=author&query=Pitz%2C+M. He has done quite a bit of work with homeomorphism types of one-point deleted subsets. I think he uses the phrase "deck of cards" to describe (the homeomorphism classes of) all subspaces $X\setminus \{x\}$. $\endgroup$ – Forever Mozart Jun 12 '18 at 0:00
7
$\begingroup$

Let $X = {\mathbb R} \setminus {\mathbb Z}$, that is, $X$ is the free union of countably many open intervals. Then $X$ is point-removable insensitive because the removal of any point leaves a free union of countably many open intervals. However, $X \times X$ is not point-removal insensitive because every component of $X \times X$ just a product of intervals and is, therefore, simply connected, but if any point is removed from $X \times X$, that point's component is not simply connected.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.