Diagonalisation of invariant hermitian forms and irreducible representations of tori actions here is my question:
Suppose that the torus $T^n = (S^1)^n$ acts on $\mathbb{C}^n$ by linear transformations $$(e^{i \theta_1},...,e^{i \theta_n}).(z_1,...,z_n) = (e^{i \theta_1}.z_1,...,e^{i \theta_n}.z_n),$$ and consider its diagonal action on $\mathbb{C}^{2nN} = (\mathbb{C}^n)^{2N}$, which we endow with its standard hermitian structure.
Given a $T^n$-invariant hermitian form $\mathcal{Q} : \mathbb{C}^{2nN} \to \mathbb{R}$ (or more precisely the quadratic form associated to a hermitian matrix), is it possible to find a decomposition $$\mathbb{C}^{2nN} = \overset{2nN}{\underset{k=1}{\bigoplus}}\mathbb{C}.v_k$$ of $\mathbb{C}^{2nN}$ into complex lines such that the two following requirements hold:


*

*each line $\mathbb{C}.v_k$ is $T^n$-invariant and $T^n$ acts on it by one of its standard characters $\chi(e^{i \theta_1},...,e^{i \theta_n}) = e^{i \theta_j}$, for some $j=1,...,n$;

*the hermitian form associated with $\mathcal{Q}$ is diagonal in the basis $(v_1,...,v_{2nN})$. 


Thanks for your help !
 A: We need some notation. I write $V$ for your $\Bbb C^{2nN}$, $T$ for your $T^n$,
and $\rho\colon T\to GL(V)$ for the representation of $T$ in $V$.  I define the character $\chi_j$ of $T$ by 
 $$\chi_j(e^{i \theta_1},...,e^{i \theta_n}) = e^{i \theta_j}.$$
Further, for each $j$  I define a subspace $V_j$ of $V$ by 
$$V_j=\{x\in V\ |\ \rho(t) x=\chi_j(t)x\quad\text{for all }t\in T\}.$$
Let $j'\neq j$, $x\in V_j$, $x'\in V_{j'}$.
Since the hermitian form $\mathcal Q$ is $T$-invariant, we have
$$\mathcal Q(\rho(t) x,\rho(t) x')=\mathcal Q( x, x').$$
On the other hand, it follows from the definition of $V_j$ and $V_{j'}$ that
$${\mathcal Q}(\rho(t) x,\rho(t) x')={\mathcal Q}(\,\chi_j(t) x,\,\chi_{j'}(t) x'\,)=\chi_j(t)\chi_{j'}(t)^{-1}{\mathcal Q}(x,x').$$ 
Since $\chi_j\neq \chi_{j'}$, we see that ${\mathcal Q}(x,x')=0$.
This the subspaces $V_j$ and $V_{j'}$ are orthogonal with respect to 
${\mathcal Q}$. 
Let ${\mathcal Q}_j$ denote the restriction of ${\mathcal Q}$ to $V_j$.
We diagonalize each ${\mathcal Q}_j$ and thus obtain a desired diagonalization of ${\mathcal Q}$.
