1
$\begingroup$

Let $F$ be a infinite-dimensional complex Hilbert space, with inner product $\langle\cdot\;| \;\cdot\rangle$, the norm $\|\cdot\|$, the 1-sphere $S(0,1)=\{x\in F;\;\|x\|=1\}$ and let $\mathcal{B}(F)$ be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on $F$.

Let $M\in \mathcal{B}(F)$ be a bounded operator. Suppose

  • that $M\in \mathcal{B}(F)^+$, i.e., $\langle Mx,x\rangle\geq0$ for all $x\in F$, and

  • that $M$ is an injective operator on $F$.

Consider $$S_M(0,1)=\{x\in F:\;\langle Mx, x\rangle=1\}.$$

According to this answer $S_M(0,1)$ is always homeomorphic to the 1-sphere $S(0,1)$.

If $M$ is not injective ($M\ne 0$), I want to find an example such that $S_M(0,1)$ is is not homeomorphic to the 1-sphere of $F$ denoted $S(0,1)$.

I think if $F$ is an infinite-dimensional complex Hilbert space and if we find an operator $M$ such that $S_M(0,1)$ is compact then $S_M(0,1)$ is not homeomorphic to $S(0,1)$. Indeed $S(0,1)$ is compact iff $F$ is finite-dimensional.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If $M$ is e. g. a projection, then if I am not mistaken $S_M(0,1)$ is the cartesian product of the 1-sphere for the subspace you project onto and the orthogonal complement of that subspace. $\endgroup$ – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე May 20 '18 at 15:00
  • $\begingroup$ $M = 0$ satisfies your criteria, though it's probably not what you're looking for. $\endgroup$ – Arun Debray May 20 '18 at 15:52
  • $\begingroup$ @ArunDebray Yes $M$ is assumed non zero operator $\endgroup$ – Schüler May 20 '18 at 16:04
1
$\begingroup$

Taras Banakh's answer to your original question essentially answers this one too. Take $F=l^2$ and take $M$ to be the projection on the first to coordinates. Then $S_M(0,1)=\{(a_1,a_2,a_3,...)\in l^2,|a_1|^2+|a_2|^2=1\}$, which is homeomorphic to $S^1\times l^2$, where $S^1$ - the usual circle.

Then the unit sphere of $l^2$ and $S^1\times l^2$ are not homeomorphic, since the former is simply connected (easy to see), and the latter is not: its fundamental group is the product of the fundamental groups of $S^1$ and $l^2$ and is therefore isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Could you please explain me why the unit sphere of $l^2$ and $S^1\times l^2$ are not homeomorphic?Thanks a lot $\endgroup$ – Schüler May 23 '18 at 14:35
  • $\begingroup$ I kind of do explain in the body of the answer: the unit sphere of $l^2$ is simply connected, while $S^1\times l^2$ is not. $\endgroup$ – erz May 23 '18 at 23:44
  • $\begingroup$ Could you please explain me why the unit sphere of $l^2$ is simply connected however $S^1\times l^2$ is not? Thanks a lot. $\endgroup$ – Schüler Nov 16 '18 at 6:59
  • $\begingroup$ The explanation of the second claim is already written in the answer. The unit sphere of $l^{2}$ is simply connected, because of stereographic projection: draw a loop, take a point not on that loop, stereographically project the sphere on $l^2$ with respect to that point, deform the obtained loop to a point, then project the homotopy back. I hope this explanation makes sense. $\endgroup$ – erz Nov 16 '18 at 10:23
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. Is there a reference to cite it?i.e. A reference where i find the resultat that explain why the unit sphere of a hilbert space is simply connected. Thanks $\endgroup$ – Schüler Nov 16 '18 at 10:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.