The statement of the theorem is as follows: Let $\rho$ be an irreducible two-dimensional representation of $G_\mathbb{Q}=Gal(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$ with Artin conductor $N$. Suppose that $\epsilon = \det(\rho)$ is odd and $\rho$ satisfies condition $(A)$. Let $L(s,\rho) = \sum a_n n^{-s}$. Then the function $f(z) = a_n q^n$ is a normalized newform on $\Gamma_0(N)$ of type $(k, \epsilon)$.

The condition (A) is: There exists a positive integer $M$ such that, for all one-dimensional representation $\chi$ of with Artin conductor prime to $M$, $\Lambda(s, \rho \otimes \chi)$ is entire, in particular, is holomorphic at $s = 0, 1$.

For proving it, I need to consider the Artin root number $W(\rho \otimes \chi)$. In the article ''Local Constants'' by Tate in the Durham symposium (MR0457408), he has proved that $$W(\rho \otimes \sigma) = (-1)^a \det{}_\rho(\mathfrak{f}(\sigma)) \det{}_\sigma (\mathfrak{f}(\rho)) W(\rho)^{\dim(\sigma)} W(\sigma)^{\dim(\rho)}$$ where $\mathfrak{f}$ is the Artin conductor, and $a$ is the number of archimedean places such that both $\det_\rho$ and $\det_\sigma$ are non-trivial (at the decomposition group of that archimedean place).

In the setting of Weil-Langlands, the term $W(\rho \otimes \chi)$ then reads

$$(-1)^a \epsilon(m) \chi(N) W(\rho) W(\chi)^2$$ $$=(-1)^a W(\rho) \epsilon(m) \chi(-N) \frac{G(\chi)}{G(\overline{\chi})}$$ where $m$ is the conductor of $\chi$ and $G(\chi)$ is the Gauss sum.

It now suffices to show that the function $f$ is a newform, for this, I wish to apply theorem 8 of Wen-Ch'ing Winnie Li (Newforms and functional equations Math. Ann. 212 (1975) 285-315 doi:10.1007/BF01344466).

However, the term $(-1)^a$ quite bothers me, which I need it to be $1$ to apply the theorem of Li. The assumption that $\rho$ is odd then implies $\det(\rho)$ is non-trivial at the only archimedean place of $\mathbb{Q}$. For the character $\chi$, it may or may not be non-trivial at the archimedean place, so $a = 0$ or $1$ respectively. But then I can not apply the theorem in the latter case.

So how could I handle this obstruction? What have I missed?

up vote 5 down vote accepted

I managed to confuse myself trying to answer your question, but I think if it does have an answer it's likely to be as follows. According to [1], the Artin root number of a Dirichlet character $\chi$ with conductor $f_\chi$ is equal to $$ W(\chi) = \frac{\tau(\chi)}{\sqrt{f_\chi}i^a},$$ where $a=0,1$ is as in your question, and $\tau(\chi)$ is the usual Gauss sum $$\tau(\chi) = \sum_{i=1}^f \chi(a)\exp\left(\frac{2\pi i a}{f}\right).$$ Using the relation $\tau(\chi)\tau(\overline{\chi})=\chi(-1)f_\chi$ One has $$ W(\chi)^2 = \frac{\tau(\chi)}{{f_\chi}(-1)^a}\frac{\chi(-1) f_\chi}{\tau(\overline{\chi})} = (-1)^a \chi(-1)\frac{\tau(\chi)}{\tau(\overline{\chi})},$$ whereas you're substituting $\chi(-1)\frac{\tau(\chi)}{\tau(\overline{\chi})}$ for $W(\chi)^2$ in the calculation of your question. The extra $(-1)^a$ factor would then cancel out with itself.

[1]: Ehud de Shalit, Artin $L$-functions In: Bernstein J., Gelbart S. (eds) An Introduction to the Langlands Program. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-8226-2_4, (free version, dvi file)

  • Thanks for the help. It seems that I have ignored this fact. Somehow I have been assuming that it is simply $W(\chi) = \tau(\chi)/ \sqrt{f}$. – Ting-Han Huang May 16 at 6:28

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.