2
$\begingroup$

Let $k$ be a field, of any characteristic. Let $G$ be a smooth group scheme over $k$ and let $X$ be a smooth scheme of finite type over $k$. Let $Y\subseteq X$ be a smooth subscheme of $X$, and let $H\subseteq G$ be the group subscheme stabilizing $Y$ (i.e. $gY(R)=Y(R)$ for every $g\in H(R)$ and every $k$-algebra $R$). Assume that the map $Y\times^HG\to X$ is geometrically injective and surjective. Does this imply that this is an isomorphism, even in characteristic $p$ (in characteristic zero this is true much more generally, thanks to ZMT)? In all the concrete examples I have, this is true, but my examples are quite mild. One can assume that $X$ is connected, but $Y$ might not be.

By $Y\times^HG$ I mean $(Y\times G)/H$.

Edit: forgot the assumption $H$ smooth.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I believe this is false. The subgroup $k$-schemes of $G=\mathbb{G}_{a,k}^2$ isomorphic to $\alpha_{p,k}$ are parameterized by $\mathbb{P}^1_k$. Inside the group $\mathbb{P}^1_k$-scheme $\mathbb{P}^1_k \times \mathbb{G}_{a,k}^2$, let $\Gamma$ be the universal closed subgroup scheme that is finite and flat over $\mathbb{P}^1_k$ with geometric fibers isomorphic to $\alpha_p$. Denote the quotient by this subgroup scheme by $q:\mathbb{P}^1_k\times \mathbb{G}_{a,k}^2\to X$ with its induced action of $G=\mathbb{G}_{a,k}^2$. Let $Y$ be the identity section of the group $\mathbb{P}^1_k$-scheme $X$. $\endgroup$ May 8, 2018 at 17:38
  • $\begingroup$ I accidentally forgot the hypothesis $H$ smooth. Is it true now? $\endgroup$
    – Fuzuj
    May 8, 2018 at 18:48
  • $\begingroup$ "I accidentally forgot the hypothesis $H$ is smooth. Is it true now?" In my example, $H$ is the $k$-scheme $\text{Spec}\ k$ with its unique structure of a group $k$-scheme, i.e., $H$ is the trivial group scheme. So requiring $H$ to be smooth does not change the conclusion. $\endgroup$ May 8, 2018 at 18:58
  • $\begingroup$ (I took the liberty to add the "positive characteristic" tag) $\endgroup$
    – Qfwfq
    May 8, 2018 at 22:21

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

I am writing up my comment as an answer. Let $p$ be a prime integer. Let $k$ be field of characteristic $p$. Denote by $\mathbb{A}^2_k$ the $k$-scheme $\text{Spec}\ k[s,t]$ with its usual structure of group $k$-scheme, $$m:\mathbb{A}^2_k \times_{\text{Spec}\ k}\mathbb{A}^2_k \to \mathbb{A}^2_k, \ \ m^*(x) = x\otimes 1 + 1\otimes x, \ \ m^*(y) = y\otimes 1 + 1\otimes y,$$ and where the identity of this group action is the origin, i.e., the point corresponding to the maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}=\langle x,y\rangle$.

Denote by $\mathbb{P}^1_k$ the $k$-scheme $\text{Proj}\ k[u,v]$ where $u$ and $v$ each have degree $1$. The group $k$-scheme $\mathbb{A}^2_k$ induces a group $\mathbb{P}^1$-scheme by pullback, $$\text{pr}_1:\mathbb{P}^1_k \times_{\text{Spec}\ k} \mathbb{A}^2_k \to \mathbb{P}^1_k, $$ $$(\text{pr}_1,m\circ \text{pr}_{2,3}):\mathbb{P}^1_k\times_{\text{Spec}\ k}\mathbb{A}^2_k \times_{\text{Spec}\ k}\mathbb{A}^2_k \to \mathbb{P}^1_k \times_{\text{Spec}\ k} \mathbb{A}^2_k.$$ Denote by $\Gamma$ the closed subscheme of $\mathbb{P}^1_k\times_{\text{Spec}\ k}\mathbb{A}^2_k$ whose ideal sheaf is generated by $\text{pr}_2^*(\mathfrak{m}^p)$ and the equation $uy-vx$.

The closed subscheme $\Gamma$ is a subgroup $\mathbb{P}^1$-scheme of $\mathbb{P}^1_k\times_{\text{Spec}\ k}\mathbb{A}^2_k,$ that is finite and flat over $\mathbb{P}^1_k$, and there exists a unique finite, flat morphism of group $\mathbb{P}^1$-schemes, $$q:\mathbb{P}^1_k\times_{\text{Spec}\ k}\mathbb{A}^2_k \to X,$$ such that the following induced morphism is an isomorphism, $$\Gamma\times_{\mathbb{P}^1_k} \mathbb{A}^2_k \to \mathbb{A}^2_k\times_X \mathbb{A}^2_k.$$ This claim is easiest to prove Zariski locally on $\mathbb{P}^1_k$. On the dense open subset $D_+(u)\subset \mathbb{P}^1_k$, there is an isomorphism of group $D_+(u)$-schemes, $$\phi_u:D_+(u)\times_{\text{Spec}\ k} \mathbb{A}^2_k \to D_+(u)\times_{\text{Spec}\ k} \mathbb{A}^2_k, \ \ \phi_u^*x = x, \ \phi_u^*y = y+(v/u)x.$$ The inverse image of $\Gamma$ is $D_+(u)\times (\alpha_p\times \{0\}),$ i.e., the copy of $\alpha_p$ in the first factor of $\mathbb{A}^2_k$. A quotient by this inverse image group $D_+(u)$-scheme is the finite flat morphism of group $D_+(u)$-schemes, $$q_u:D_+(u)\times \mathbb{A}^2_k \to D_+(u)\times \mathbb{A}^2_k, \ \ q_u^*(x) = x^p, \ \ q_u^*(y) = y.$$ There is a similar description on $D_+(v)$, and the uniqueness of quotients allows to glue these quotients on $D_+(u)\cap D_+(v)$.

The quotient group morphism $q$ induces an action of the group $\mathbb{P}^1$-scheme $\mathbb{P}^1_k\times_{\text{Spec}\ k} \mathbb{A}^2_k$ on $X$. This is equivalent to an action of $\mathbb{A}^2_k$ on the $k$-scheme $X$ such that the projection morphism, $$\pi:X\to \mathbb{P}^1_k,$$ is $\mathbb{A}^2_k$-invariant. Define $Y$ to be the image of the section of $\pi$ coming from the group identity. The inverse image of $Y$ under $q$ equals $\Gamma$. Thus, the stabilizer subgroup $k$-scheme $H$ of $Y$ equals the subgroup $k$-scheme that maps $\Gamma$ to itself.

In particular, for the fiber $\Gamma_0$ over $\text{Zero}(v)\subset \mathbb{P}^1_k$, this is a subgroup $k$-scheme of $\mathbb{A}^2_k$ whose regular action on $\mathbb{A}^2_k$ maps $\alpha_p\times\{0\}$ to itself, i.e., a subgroup $k$-scheme of $\alpha_p\times\{0\}$. On the other hand, for the fiber $\Gamma_\infty$ over $\text{Zero}(u)\subset \mathbb{P}^1_k$, this is a subgroup $k$-scheme of $\{0\}\times \alpha_p.$ The intersection of these two subgroup $k$-schemes of $\mathbb{A}^2_k$ is the trivial subgroup scheme $\text{Spec}\ k$. Thus, $H$ is the trivial subgroup $k$-scheme.

The induced morphism $(Y\times G)/\Delta(H) \to X$ is simply the morphism $q$. This morphism is a universal homeomorphism. However, the morphism $q$ is not an isomorphism: it is finite and flat of degree $p>1$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.