8
$\begingroup$

Let $(X;U,V)$ be an excisive triad and consider the corresponding part of the Mayer-Vietoris sequence $H^{\bullet-1}(U\cap V)\stackrel{\delta^*}{\to} H^\bullet(X)\to H^\bullet(U)\oplus H^\bullet(V)$. Now let $\alpha,\beta\in H^{\bullet-1}(U\cap V)$. Can we say anything about $\delta^*(\alpha\smile\beta)$?

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I don't think you can in general, but if $\alpha$ is the restriction from $X$ of $\alpha'$, then $\delta^*(\alpha \cup \beta) = \alpha' \cup \beta$. You can check this by properly choosing a lift of $\alpha \cup \beta$ as a chain to $U$ ($\alpha'|_U \cup \beta'$ for some lift $\beta'$). $\endgroup$ – S. carmeli May 3 '18 at 17:00
  • $\begingroup$ Can you extend on our argument or do you have a reference for it? This formula would be great, but I only find the version for the relative cohomology sequence. $\endgroup$ – FKranhold Jul 8 '18 at 12:49
4
$\begingroup$

Here are some comments.

The map $\delta^\ast$ is a composition of the form $\require{AMScd}$

\begin{CD} H^{\ast-1}(U\cap V) @> \sigma >\cong > H^{\ast}(\Sigma (U\cap V)) \to H^\ast X \end{CD}

where the first map is given by the suspension isomorphism and the second is induced by the map $X\to \Sigma(U\cap V)$ which cones off $U$ and $V$ in $X$ (here $\Sigma$ means suspension). This second displayed map is cup product preserving so it is sufficient to investigate the first map.

Setting $Z = U\cap V$, represent your cohomology classes as maps $a: X \to K(\Bbb Z,k)$, $b: X \to K(\Bbb Z,\ell)$ (where we the Hopf classification theorem to identify $H^k(X)$ with $[X,K(\Bbb Z,k)]$, where $K(\Bbb Z,k)$ is the Eilenberg-Mac Lane space). Then $a\cup b$ is given by $\require{AMScd}$ \begin{CD} X @>\text{diag} >> X \wedge X @>a\wedge b>> K(\Bbb Z,k)\wedge K(\Bbb Z,\ell) @> m >> K(\Bbb Z,k+\ell)\, . \end{CD} where $m$ represents the evident cohomology class in degree $k+\ell$ of the smash product (using the Künneth formula).

The class $\sigma(a\cup b)$ is given by \begin{CD} \Sigma X @>\Sigma \text{diag} >> \Sigma X \wedge X @>\Sigma a\wedge b>> \Sigma K(\Bbb Z,k))\wedge K(\Bbb Z,\ell) @>\Sigma m>> \Sigma K(\Bbb Z,k+\ell)\to K(\Bbb Z,k+\ell+1)\, , \end{CD} where the last map represents the generator of $H^{k+\ell+1}(\Sigma K(\Bbb Z,k+\ell))$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What is a reference for this description of the Mayer-Vietoris map $\delta^\ast$? I haven't seen it in Hatcher, Dold, Spanier, etc. (albeit the standard references seem to only elaborate on the homological MV unless it's using de Rham cohomology). I take it "cones off" means pinches off $U-(U\cap V)$ and $V-(U\cap V)$ separately in $X$. I like this description because then it's easy to see that elements in $Im(\delta^\ast)$ have trivial (cup product) square. $\endgroup$ – Chris Gerig Dec 25 '18 at 20:06
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know of a reference; it's probably folklore. It is a reinterpretation that uses the Barratt-Puppe sequence. There's a cofiber sequence $X \to \Sigma (U \cap V) \to \Sigma U \vee \Sigma V$, where $\Sigma$ means unreduced suspension. The sequence wiill induce the Mayer-Vietoris sequence on cohomology. $\endgroup$ – John Klein Dec 26 '18 at 4:05
  • $\begingroup$ "cones off" refers to the following: There is an inclusion $X = U \cup_{U\cap V} V \to CU \cup_{U\cap V} C V \simeq \Sigma (U\cap V)$, where $C$ means the unreduced cone. $\endgroup$ – John Klein Dec 26 '18 at 4:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.