Obstruction Theory for Vector Bundles and Connections I know that the property that a vector bundle on a manifold is flat is equivalent to it being a pull-back from the fundamental groupoid. Namely, there is a map $X \to P_{\le 1} X$ from $X$ to its first Postnikov truncation, and giving a flat connection on a bundle is essentially the same as writing it as a pull-back along this map. 
Are there any known "higher equations" on a connection that guarantee that $V$ is a pull-back from a higher Postnikov truncation, say, that it is a pull-back from $P_{\le 2} X$? Intuitively that would mean that the vector bundle "depends only on the first 3 homotopies, including $\pi_0$", in some sense. 
Edit: As mentioned in  John Klein's answer and comments, the condition of being flat is stronger than being a pullback from the 1-st Postnikov filtra, since it is actually equivlent to lifting the map $X \to BG$ through the classifying space of the discrete group $G^\delta$. Thus, one can at most ask for a $\textbf{sufficient}$ differential geometric condition on a connection to guarantee that the vector bundle factor through $P_{\le 2}X$, say. 
Thus, the remaining question is: Can we find such a sufficient condition on a connection, which is weaker than flatness? 
 A: Correction: the definition below is wrong. It isn't true that a 1-flat reduction is the same as a flat reduction. One also needs to require that the map $Z \to BG$ factors through $BG^\delta$, where $G^\delta$ is  $G$ with the discrete topology. (Also, one may as well replace $Z$ by the $k$-th Postnikov section in the definition of a $k$-structure).  
The following is thoroughly useless general nonsense. Its main problem is that it lacks geometry. Even so,  it kind of does the job and it is probably worth mentioning. 
Let $G$ be the structure group of your vector bundle. For simplicity, I will assume that $G$ is connected (for example, $G$ could be $U(n)$ or $SO(n)$). Let our vector bundle be classified by a map $f: X\to BG$.
Definition: Let $k \ge 1$ be an integer. A $k$-structure is a pair $(Z,g)$ such that
$\bullet$ $Z$ is a path connected space.
$\bullet$ $Z$ has vanishing homotopy groups above dimension $k$, and
$\bullet$ $g: Z\to BG\, $ is a map.
[To such pairs $(Z_i,g_i)$ for $i=0,1$ and  are equivalent there is a (finite chain of) weak homotopy equivalences over $BG$ from $Z_0$ to $Z_1$.]
Example: A 1-structure amounts to a discrete group $H$ and a map $BH\to BG$.
Definition: A $k$-flat reduction of $f$ consists of a $k$-structure $(Z,g)$ and a factorization of $f$ up to homotopy as 
$\require{AMScd}$
$$
\begin{CD}
X \to Z @>g>> BG\, . \\
\end{CD}
$$
Examples:
(1). A 1-flat reduction of $f$ is the same thing as a flat reduction of the associated vector bundle.
(2). An oriented line bundle over $X$ automatically admits a $2$-flat reduction (this is a tautology, since $BSO(2) = K(\Bbb Z,2)$. 
In particular, the canonical line bundle over $\Bbb CP^1$ admits a 2-flat reduction but not a 1-flat reduction (since it isn't flat).
More generally, a finite Whitney sum of oriented line bundles admits a $2$-flat reduction, since $BSO(2)^{\times j} =  K(\Bbb Z^j,2)$.
(3). I don't know of examples in degrees $\ge 2$. However, if one is willing to work instead in the rational homotopy category, there are examples in higher degrees. Here's one: let $X= S^4$. This includes into $BS^3 = BSU(2)$. Rationally, this is a $K(\Bbb Q,4)$. Taking $G = SU(2)$ and $f: X\to BG$ to be the inclusion (which represents the quaternionic line bundle),  we see that $f$ is rationally $4$-flat but not rationally $3$-flat.
