3
$\begingroup$

Let $N$ be a positive integer and $p$ a prime not dividing $N$. Let $X_0(N)$ be the modular curve (over $\mathbb{Q}$) associated to the congruence subgroup $\Gamma_0(N)$, which is the subgroup of $\text{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$ consisting of upper triangular matrices modulo $N$. Let $\pi_1$ and $\pi_p$ be two degeneracy maps from $X_0(Np)$ to $X_0(N)$ defined by "forgetting the level $p$ structure" and "dividing by the level $p$ structure" on the associated moduli problem. If we identify $X_0(Np)(\mathbb{C})\simeq \Gamma_0(Np)\backslash(\mathbb{H} \cup \mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{Q}))$ and $X_0(N)(\mathbb{C})\simeq \Gamma_0(N)\backslash(\mathbb{H} \cup \mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{Q}))$, then we have

$$ \pi_1(z)=z \pmod {\Gamma_0(N)} ~~\text{ and }~~ \pi_p(z)=pz \pmod {\Gamma_0(N)}. $$ Let $w_p$ be the Atkin-Lehner involution on $X_0(Np)$ which satisfies $$ \pi_1\circ w_p = \pi_p. $$

Now, we want to understand how these maps send cusps explicitly. Let $C(Np)$ and $C(N)$ denote the sets of cusps on $X_0(Np)$ and $X_0(N)$, respectively. Then the maps $\pi_1$ and $\pi_p$ send $C(Np)$ to $C(N)$, and $w_p$ becomes an involution on $C(Np)$ by restriction. Let $$ S_1=\{ (\begin{smallmatrix} x \\ d \end{smallmatrix}) : d \mid N, ~(x, d)=1,~1\leq x \leq d, ~x \text{ taken modulo } (d, N/d) \} $$ and $$ S_2=\{ (\begin{smallmatrix} x \\ dp \end{smallmatrix}) : d \mid N, ~(x, dp)=1,~1\leq x \leq dp, ~x \text{ taken modulo } (dp, N/d) \}. $$ (Note that $(dp, N/d)=(d, N/d)$.) Then, we have $$ C(Np)=S_1 \cup S_2 ~\text{ and }~ C(N)=S_1 $$ (cf. Section 3.8 of Diamond-Shurman's book, A first course in modular forms). I think that from the description of the maps $\pi_1$ and $\pi_p$ on $X_0(Np)(\mathbb{C})$, we have $$ \pi_1((\begin{smallmatrix} x \\ d \end{smallmatrix}))=(\begin{smallmatrix} x \\ d \end{smallmatrix}) \text{ and } \pi_p((\begin{smallmatrix} x \\ d \end{smallmatrix}))= (\begin{smallmatrix} y \\ d \end{smallmatrix}), $$ where $y$ is the remainder of $px$ divided by $d$. Also, we have $$ \pi_1((\begin{smallmatrix} x \\ dp \end{smallmatrix}))=(\begin{smallmatrix} z \\ d \end{smallmatrix}) \text{ and } \pi_p((\begin{smallmatrix} x \\ dp \end{smallmatrix}))= (\begin{smallmatrix} z \\ d \end{smallmatrix}), $$ where $z$ is the remainder of $x$ divided by $d$. I guess that $w_p$ gives rise to a bijection between $S_1$ and $S_2$.

I have two questions:

Q1. Are the above formulas correct? If not, what are the correct ones?

Q2. What is the explicit description of $w_p$? In other words, what are $$ w_p((\begin{smallmatrix} x \\ d \end{smallmatrix})) ~\text{ and }~ w_p((\begin{smallmatrix} x \\ dp \end{smallmatrix}))? $$

So far, I have tried to compute them using $\pi_1 \circ w_p=\pi_p$, but I failed. I hope someone can help me to understand this problem.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Using an explicit description of the Atkin-Lehner involution $w_p$ as an element $W_p$ of $M_2(\mathbb{Z})$ (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atkin%E2%80%93Lehner_theory), we may choose $$ W_p=\begin{pmatrix} ap & -b \\ Np & p \end{pmatrix}, $$ where $a$ and $b$ are taken so that $ap+bN=1$. (This is possible because $(p, N)=1$.)

Then, we compute
$$ w_p \left(\begin{pmatrix} x \\ d \end{pmatrix} \right) = W_p \begin{pmatrix} x \\ d \end{pmatrix} \equiv\begin{pmatrix} a \\ dp \end{pmatrix}, $$ where $a=x$ if $(x, p)=1$ and $a=x+d$ if $d \mid x$. (Here, for two vectors $X$ and $Y$, $X \equiv Y$ means that $X$ and $Y$ represent the same cusp.) Also, $$ w_p \left(\begin{pmatrix} x \\ dp \end{pmatrix} \right) = W_p \begin{pmatrix} x \\ dp \end{pmatrix}\equiv \begin{pmatrix} z \\ d \end{pmatrix}. $$

Moreover, we have $$ \pi_1 \left(\begin{pmatrix} x \\ dp \end{pmatrix} \right)=\begin{pmatrix} x \\ dp \end{pmatrix}\equiv \begin{pmatrix} px \\ d \end{pmatrix}\equiv\begin{pmatrix} y \\ d \end{pmatrix} $$ as cusps on $X_0(N)$. The equivalence in the middle follows from the fact that $(N, p)=1$.

By this computation, everything is now "coherent".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.