7
$\begingroup$

My understanding is that the Eichler-Shimura relation expresses the Hecke operator $T_p$ in terms of the geometric Frobenius map. Specifically, $T_p = Frob + Ver$ for Frobenius map $Frob$ and it's transpose $Ver$.

However, Wikipedia states that "the Eichler–Shimura congruence relation expresses the local L-function of a modular curve at a prime p in terms of the eigenvalues of Hecke operators".

I have no idea how that statement comes from the above definition of the congruence. How does such a decomposition of Hecke operators have anything to with its eigenvalues or L-functions of a modular curve?

EDIT: Will's amazing answer gives the connection between L-functions and eigenvalues, but how is the local L-function of a modular curve restated explicitly using Eichler-Shimura?

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

Recall that the local $L$-function of the modular curve $X$ is $$\frac{1}{\det \left(1 - p^{-s} \operatorname{Frob}_p, H^1(X, \mathbb Q_\ell)\right)}.$$

The denominator is simply a variant of the characteristic polynomial of Frobenius, o it is sufficient to relate the eigenvalues of Frobenius to the Hecke eigenvalues.

Now because $FV = p$, $F$ and $V$ commute, and so for each $\lambda$ an eigenvalue of $F$, $\lambda+ p/\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $F+V$.

Using this, one can give formulas for the characteristic polynomial of the Hecke operator in terms of the characteristic polynomial of Frobenius, or vice versa.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! How can you explicitly restate the local L-function using Eichler-Shimura? $\endgroup$ – TreFox Apr 22 '18 at 18:27
  • $\begingroup$ @TreFox The formula you end up with is $\prod_f 1/ (1 - a_p(f) p^{-1} + p^{1-2s})$ where $f$ are a basis for the cusp forms and $a_p(f)$ is the $p$th Hecke eigenvalue. This is for the compact modular curve, there are additional terms in the noncompact case (which can be related to the Eisenstein series). $\endgroup$ – Will Sawin Apr 22 '18 at 18:55
  • $\begingroup$ Huh - so, despite the similarties, the L-function of a modular form is not the same as the zeta function of the Hecke operator? (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeta_function_(operator)) $\endgroup$ – TreFox Apr 22 '18 at 19:50
  • $\begingroup$ @TreFox Because there are only finitely many Hecke eigenvalues on any given space of holomorphic modular forms, the zeta function of the Hecke operator would not make an interesting L-function. $\endgroup$ – Will Sawin Apr 22 '18 at 20:03
  • $\begingroup$ Is the L-function of a modular form a special case of the operator-zeta function for any operator? $\endgroup$ – TreFox Apr 22 '18 at 20:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.