I've got a pretty basic question from the paper SEIBERG-WITTEN THEORY AND RANDOM PARTITIONS, https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0306238.pdf.

In (4.25) the author expressed the partition function corresponding to a vector of Young's Diagrams $\mathbf{k}$ (described by a functiion $f_{\mathbf{a},\mathbf{k}}(x)$ as \begin{equation} Z_{\mathbf{k}}(\mathbf{a},\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2,\Lambda) = \exp\left(-\frac{1}{4}\int_{x\neq y}dxdy f''_{\mathbf{a},\mathbf{k}}(x|\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2)f''_{\mathbf{a},\mathbf{k}}(y|\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2)\gamma_{\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2}(x-y|\Lambda)\right). \end{equation} where I suppose the double integral is over a portion of $\mathbb{R}^2$. The function $\gamma_{\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2}(x-y|\Lambda)$ is defined in Appendix A. The $x\neq y$ part isn't really there in the paper, but it appeared in (4.24) and the integral agrees with the formula (3.6) with $x\neq y$, so I suppose that it should be there. Then the author considered the limit $\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2 \rightarrow 0$, $f_{\mathbf{a},\mathbf{k}}(x)$ becomes a continuous function $f(x)$ and claimed that the partition function to the leading term of its exponent in this limit should be (4.29) \begin{equation} Z_{\mathbf{k}}(\mathbf{a},\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2,\Lambda) \approx Z_f(\mathbf{a},\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2, \Lambda) \approx \exp\left(\frac{1}{\epsilon_1\epsilon_2}\mathcal{E}_\Lambda(f)\right) \end{equation} where \begin{equation} \mathcal{E}_\Lambda(f) = -\frac{1}{2}\int_{y < x}dxdy f''(x)f''(y)(x - y)^2\left(\frac{1}{2}\log\left(\frac{x - y}{\Lambda}\right) - \frac{3}{4}\right). \end{equation} My problem with this is that if I just substitute the leading term of $\gamma_{\epsilon_1, \epsilon_2}$ as presented in equation (A.3) into the formula for $Z_{\mathbf{k}}(\mathbf{a},\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2,\Lambda)$ I would get the leading exponent term to be \begin{equation} \bar{\mathcal{E}}_\Lambda(f) = -\frac{1}{4}\int_{y \neq x}dxdy f''(x)f''(y)(x - y)^2\left(\frac{1}{2}\log\left(\frac{x - y}{\Lambda}\right) - \frac{3}{4}\right) \end{equation} instead (the integral limit is $x\neq y$ instead of $y < x$). When $x < y$, I would naively believe that $\log((x-y)/\Lambda) = \log(|x - y|/\Lambda) + i\pi$ and so $\bar{\mathcal{E}}_\Lambda(f) - \mathcal{E}_\Lambda(f) = 2\pi iN\sum_{l = 1}^N a^2_l$. Since the main result of this paper is that the leading exponent term $\mathcal{E}_\Lambda(f_*)$ is the Seiberg-Witten prepotential and it is well-known (among other things) that the $\partial/\partial a_l$ derivatives of SW prepotential must relate $A$ and $B$-periods of SW curves so I'm quite worried that I keep getting this extra ($\{a_l\}$ dependent term) $2\pi iN\sum_{l = 1}^N a^2_l$ term.

So what did I do wrong in going from (4.25) to (4.28)?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.