This is along the lines of this question

Gerbes are not just topological objects: we can do differential geometry with them too. We shall next describe what a connection on a gerbe is.

To begin with, let’s look at a connection on a line bundle which is given by transition functions $g_{\alpha\beta}:U_\alpha\cap U_\beta\rightarrow S^1\subseteq \mathbb{C}^*$. A connection on consists of $1$ forms $A_\alpha$ defined on $U_\alpha$ such that on a twofold intersection $U_\alpha\cap U_\beta$ we have $iA_\alpha-iA_\beta=g_{\alpha\beta}^{-1}dg_{\alpha\beta}$

I know what is a connection $1$ form (on principal bundle) but not as in above version. I am trying to relate what I know with what is given here.

Let $(P,M,\pi)$ be a principal $G$ bundle with $\mathfrak{g}=T_eG$ and transition functions $g_{\alpha\beta}:U_\alpha\cap U_\beta\rightarrow G$.

Definition : A connection form on $P$ is a $\mathfrak{g}$ valued $1$ form $\omega$ on $P$ such that

  • $\omega(p)(A^*(p))=A$ for all $A\in \mathfrak{g}$ and $p\in P$
  • $(\delta_g^*\omega)(p)(v)=Ad_{g^{-1}}(\omega(p)(v))$ for all $p\in P,g\in G$ and $v\in T_pP$.

Given a connection $1$ form $\omega$ on $P$ I am trying to associate a collection of $1$ forms $\{A_\alpha\}$ with some compatability conditions (here $A_\alpha$ is a $1$ form on $U_\alpha$).

Given local trivialization $\psi_\alpha$, we have a section of $\pi$ namely $\sigma_\alpha:U_\alpha\rightarrow P$ defined as $\sigma_\alpha(x)=\psi_\alpha^{-1}(x,e)$. Given local trivialization $\psi_\beta$, we have a section of $\pi$ namely $\sigma_\beta:U_\beta\rightarrow P$ defined as $\sigma_\beta(x)=\psi_\beta^{-1}(x,e)$.

Suppose $x\in U_\alpha\cap U_\beta$ then, we have $\sigma_\alpha(x)\in \pi^{-1}(x)$ and $\sigma_\beta(x)\in \pi^{-1}(x)$. Thus, there exists $g\in G$ (depending on $x$) such that $\sigma_\beta(x)=\sigma_\alpha(x)g$. Given $x\in U_\alpha\cap U_\beta$ there is an obvious choice for an element of $G$ namely $g_{\alpha\beta}(x)$. I see that we have $\sigma_\beta(x)=\sigma_\alpha(x)g_{\alpha\beta}(x)$ for all $x\in U_{\alpha}\cap U_\beta$ i.e., $\sigma_\beta=\sigma_\alpha g_{\alpha\beta}$.

Given a $1$ form $\omega$ on $P$ and we can pull back $\omega$ to $U_\alpha$ under $\sigma_\alpha$ to get $1$ form $\omega_\alpha=\sigma_\alpha^*\omega$ on $U_\alpha$ similarly we can pull back to $U_\beta$ to get $1$ form $\omega_\beta=\sigma_\beta^*\omega$ on $U_\beta$.

As $\sigma_\alpha$ and $\sigma_\beta$ are related by $\sigma_\alpha=\sigma_\beta g_{\alpha\beta}$, one can expect that $\omega_\alpha$ and $\omega_\beta$ are related some how. Given $g_{\alpha\beta}:U_{\alpha\beta}\rightarrow G$ we can produce a $1$ form on $U_\alpha\beta$ as pull back of $\theta$ on $G$ i.e., the canonical $1$ form on $G$ which is a left invariant $1$ form determined by $\theta(e)(A)=A$ for all $A\in \mathfrak{g}$. Let us denote pull back of $\theta$ to $U_\alpha\cap U_\beta$ by $\theta_{\alpha\beta}$. Then, I am expecting some compatibility relation between $1$ forms $\omega_\alpha,\omega_\beta$ and $\theta_{\alpha\beta}$ that should come from $\sigma_\alpha=\sigma_\beta g_{\alpha\beta}$.

EDIT : I could see in Kobayshi and Nomizu that these local connection forms $\sigma_\alpha$ are related by $$ \sigma_\beta(p)(X_p)=ad(g_{\alpha\beta}(p)^{-1})(\sigma_\alpha(p)(X_p))+\theta_{\alpha\beta}(p)(X_p) \text{ on } U_\alpha\cap U_\beta.$$ In short, we have $$\sigma_\beta=ad(g_{\alpha\beta}^{-1})\sigma_\alpha+\theta_{\alpha\beta} \text{ on } U_\alpha\cap U_\beta$$

I see that people use $g_{\alpha\beta}^{-1}dg_{\alpha\beta}$ (notation of Maurer Cartan differential of a map $g_{\alpha\beta}:U_\alpha\cap U_\beta\rightarrow G$) to denote what we have called as $\theta_{\alpha\beta}$. So, in this notation, we have

$$\sigma_\beta=ad(g_{\alpha\beta}^{-1})\sigma_\alpha+g_{\alpha\beta}^{-1}d g_{\alpha\beta}\text{ on } U_\alpha\cap U_\beta.$$

Question : I am trying to understand how $\sigma_\beta=ad(g_{\alpha\beta}^{-1})\sigma_\alpha+g_{\alpha\beta}^{-1}d g_{\alpha\beta}\text{ on } U_\alpha\cap U_\beta$ on principal bundles has its similar part as $iA_\alpha-iA_\beta=g_{\alpha\beta}^{-1}dg_{\alpha\beta}$ in case of line bundles.

Any suggestion/reference on how to see this is welcome.


1 Answer 1


A principal $G$-bundle $P\to M$ can be described by an open cover $(U_\alpha)$ of $M$ and a cocycle $g_{\beta\alpha}: U_\alpha\cap U_\beta\to G$. The total space is the quotient of the disjoint union of the spaces $U_\alpha\times G$ via the equivalence relation

$$ U_\alpha\times g\ni (x, g')\sim (y, g'')\in U_\beta\times G $$ iff $$ x=y,\;\;g''=g_{\beta\alpha}(x)\cdot g'. $$

A section of a $G$ bundle is then a collection of smooth maps

$$\sigma_\alpha: U_\alpha\to G $$

satisfying the gluing conditions

$$ \sigma_\beta(x)=g_{\beta\alpha}(x)\cdot \sigma_\alpha(x),\;\;\forall x\in U_\alpha\cap U_\beta. $$

  • $\begingroup$ Hi, thanks for your answer. Question was more about connections than about this identity. I was sure about this identity from my version and also know that when constructing principal bundle from trnaistition functions this condition holds. Please suggest something for Question I have asked about connections on P giving connections on A_\alpha and their compatibility condition. $\endgroup$ Apr 10, 2018 at 0:40
  • $\begingroup$ Check the book of Kobayashi and Nomizu. $\endgroup$ Apr 10, 2018 at 10:17
  • $\begingroup$ I guess I am misunderstanding your statement "A section of a $G$ bundle is then a collection of smooth maps $\sigma_\alpha:U_\alpha\rightarrow G$ [---]" You mean local sections? Or you mean given this collection there exists a (global) section $M\rightarrow P$ of $\pi:P\rightarrow M$ $\endgroup$ Apr 12, 2018 at 8:42
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please clarify my doubt. $\endgroup$ Apr 14, 2018 at 13:17
  • $\begingroup$ I should have said that the collection $(U_\alpha)$ is an open cover of $M$. $\endgroup$ Apr 14, 2018 at 15:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.