0
$\begingroup$

Suppose $H$ is an $n\times n$ symmetric positive definite matrix, $M_k$ is a sequence of $n \times n$ matrix (not necessarily symmetric) such that $M_k \to O$ where $O$ is the zero matrix. Let $\lambda_i(H),i=1,...,n$ denote the operator that gets the $i$th largest eigenvalue of $H$ in absolute value. My question is, is it true that $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{k \to \infty } \lambda_i (H + {M_k}) = \lambda_i (H),i=1,...,n$?

If this is not true for every $i$, is it true for $i=1$ (largest eigenvalue) and $i=n$ (smallest eigenvalue)? (My application only needs this one to hold)

Any explanation, counterexample or reference is helpful. Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Isn't this straightforward? Just diagonalize $H$, and the corresponding perturbed sequence converges to a diagonal matrix ...; this seems to only require that $H$ be diagonalizable. $\endgroup$ – David Handelman Apr 7 '18 at 3:00
2
$\begingroup$

As stated, $H+M_k$ need not have real eigenvalues; what is the largest then. If $f_A(\lambda)$ is the characteristic polynomial of a matrix $A$, then a simple eigenvalue depends locally real analytically on $A$, by the implicit function theorem.

If all eigenvalues are real and you order them by size, then each eigenvalue depends continuously on $A$, even if they cross eachother. For information on this and more general situations see this paper and references therein.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.