For the purposes of this question, a rank-$r$ (integral) lattice is a full-rank discrete subgroup $L \subset \mathbb R^r$ such that $\langle \ell, \ell' \rangle \in \mathbb Z$ for all $\ell \in L$. It is even if $\ell^2 = \langle \ell,\ell\rangle \in 2\mathbb Z$ for all $\ell \in L$ and odd if there is some $\ell$ such that $\ell^2$ is odd. Define $L^* = \{ v\in \mathbb R^n \text{ s.t. } \langle v,\ell \rangle \in \mathbb Z \, \forall \ell \in L\}$. $L$ is unimodular if $L = L^*$.

Let $L$ be an odd unimodular lattice, and define $L_{ev} = \{\ell \in L \text{ s.t. } \ell^2 \in 2\mathbb Z\}$. Then $L_{ev}$ has index $2$ in $L$, and so index $4$ in $L_{ev}^*$. The cosets of $L_{ev}$ in $L_{ev}^*$ are $L_{ev}$, $L_{odd} := L \smallsetminus L_{ev}$, and two more that I will arbitrarily name $L_+$ and $L_-$. Vectors in $L_\pm$ might have fractional length. (The structure of the group $L_{ev}^*/L_{ev}$ and the lengths of vectors in $L_\pm$ depend on the rank $r$ mod $8$.)

Given a discrete subset $S \subset \mathbb R^r$, the Theta series of $S$ is the $q$-series $ \Theta_S(q) = \sum_{s\in S} q^{s^2/2}. $ Suppose that $L$ is odd and unimodular. I find myself interested in the following function: $$ Z_{RR}(L) := \Theta_{L_+}(q) - \Theta_{L_-}(q)$$ The letters "$RR$" stand for "Ramond-Ramond", because this this shows up as an RR-sector partition function of a spin conformal field theory built from $L$ (times a power of $\eta$). I'm pretty sure that $Z_{RR}(L)$ is automatically a (level-1) modular form of weight $r$. [Edit: $r/2$.]

Let $\sqrt3\mathbb Z \subset \mathbb R$ denote the (non-unimodular) odd lattice of vectors $\ell$ such that $\ell^2 \in 3\mathbb Z$. A unimodular lattice $L$ of rank $r$ is 3-framed if it contains a copy of $(\sqrt3\mathbb Z)^r$. 3-framed lattices are in natural bijection with self-dual ternary codes; Harada and Munemasa used this bijection, together with Borcherds' classification of unimodular lattices of rank $\leq 25$, to classify self-dual ternary codes of rank $24$.

Recall the discriminant $\Delta(q) = q \prod_{n=1}^\infty (1-q^n)^{24}$. It is a modular form of weight $12$. I'm pretty sure that

Proposition: If $L$ is 3-framed and unimodular, then $Z_{RR}(L) \in \mathbb Z[\Delta]$. [Edit: $\mathbb Z[\Delta^{1/2}]$.]

I.e. I am claiming that $Z_{RR}(L)$ vanishes unless $r = 12k$, in which case $\Delta^{-k}Z_{RR}(L) \in \mathbb Z$.

By simply checking against Borcherds' classification, I know that the following conjecture is true in ranks $r = 12$ and $24$:

Conjecture: Suppose $L$ is a 3-framed unimodular lattice of rank $r = 12k$. Then the integer $\Delta^{-k}Z_{RR}(L)$ is divisible by $24$. [Edit: $\Delta^{-k/2}$.]

Is the conjecture true in general? Is it known?

[Edit: And please continue to point out errors in the comments — I'm sure there are more.]

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why is $Z_{RR}(L)$ weight $r$ rather than $r/2$ as one would usually have for the theta function of a rank $r$ lattice? $\endgroup$ Mar 21 '18 at 23:38
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Also, I think a modular form for the full modular group is usually described as having level 1, not 0; and the exponent in the product formula for $\Delta$ is 24, not 12. $\endgroup$ Mar 22 '18 at 0:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I can show that for a "3-framed" lattice your function $Z_{RR}$ vanishes unless $r = 12k$ in which case $Z_{RR}$ is a multiple of $\Delta^{k/2}$ (not $\Delta^k$). For $r=24$, it's the difference between the theta functions of two Niemeier lattices, and thus a multiple of $24\Delta$ (this works for any $L$, regardless of 3-framing). For $r=36$ and beyond I see no reason for the coefficients to be a multiple of anything bigger than the $2$ forced by central symmetry of $L_\pm$. $\endgroup$ Mar 22 '18 at 3:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I trust @NoamD.Elkies more than I trust myself: he confirms the integrality properties asserted in my question (except for $\Delta \leadsto \Delta^{1/2}$). I haven't yet read math.berkeley.edu/~reb/papers/on2/on2.pdf, but arxiv.org/pdf/math/0212397.pdf quotes from it that for $L$ of rank divisible by $24$, $\Theta_L \in 24 \Delta^{r/24} \mathbb Z + c_4\mathbb Z[c_4,\Delta]$. That might complete the proof. $\endgroup$ Mar 22 '18 at 3:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @NoamD.Elkies Hrm. There is a chance that the congruence holds more generally. The 24m+12 case isn't that far from the 24m case. Assuming I understand things correctly, the nontrivial fact about ternary codes is that a certain "index", given by a signed count of code words of maximal Hamming weight, is always divisible by 24. I tried to write it up in this question. $\endgroup$ Mar 23 '18 at 2:00

The discussion in the comments establishes the conjecture when $r$ is divisible by $24$. When $r$ is merely divisible by $12$, the comments establish that $\Delta^{-r/24} Z_{RR}$ is divisible by $12$. (The latter case follows from the former because $Z_{RR}$ is easily seen to be multiplicative.)

Specifically, when $r$ is divisible by $24$, $Z_{RR}$ is a difference of $\Theta$ series of two even unimodular lattices of rank $r$. Theorem 12.1 of https://math.berkeley.edu/~reb/papers/on2/on2.pdf establishes that every $\Theta$ series of an even unimodular lattice is a polynomial of $\Delta$ and $c_4$, and the coefficient of $\Delta^{r/24}$ is divisible by $24$.

This answer is community wiki in case someone wants to expand it.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.