7
$\begingroup$

The Hirzebruch surfaces are the $\mathbb{P}^1$ bundles $\mathbb{F_n}$ ($n\geqslant 0$) which can be obtained projectivizing the rank $2$ vector bundles $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^1}\oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^1}(n)$. Those surfaces are famous because they exhaust ($n\neq 1$) the minimal rational (smooth, projective) surfaces other than $\mathbb{P}^2$. The most familiar examples are $\mathbb{F_0}\simeq \mathbb{P}^1\times\mathbb{P}^1$ and $\mathbb{F_1}$ which is isomorphic to $\mathbb{P}^2$ blown up at a point. Other features of Hirzebruch surfaces are apparently well-known, such as its intersection theory.

My question is about automorphism groups of Hirzebruch surfaces. For the sake of comparation, the automorphism group of $\mathbb{P}^2$ is isomorphic to $PGL(3,\mathbb{C})$ and I manage to find a very nice description of $Aut(\mathbb{F_0})$ in this answer (Automorphisms of a smooth quadric surface $Q\subset\mathbb{P}^{3}$), since a quadric smooth projective surface $Q\subset \mathbb{P}^3$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{P}^1\times\mathbb{P}^1$.

Do we have a similar description of $Aut(\mathbb{F_n})$ for positive $n$?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ you can see page 12 of mimuw.edu.pl/~jarekw/EAGER/pdf/FiniteSubgroupsCremona.pdf $\endgroup$
    – Chen Jiang
    Mar 17, 2018 at 3:38
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Namely it's isomorphic to a semidirect product $V_n\rtimes (\mathrm{GL}_2/\mu_n)$ where $V_n$ is the $n$-th symmetric power of the standard 2-dimensional rep (so $\dim(V_n)=n+1$) and $\mu_n$ is the group of $n$-th roots of unity in the group of scalar matrices. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Mar 17, 2018 at 7:08

1 Answer 1

12
$\begingroup$

For $n \ge 2$ the surface $\mathbb{F}_n$ is the blowup of the weighted projective plane $\mathbb{P}(1,1,n)$ at its singular point. Because of that $$ Aut(\mathbb{F}_n) \cong Aut(\mathbb{P}(1,1,n)). $$ The automorphism group of $\mathbb{P}(w_1,w_2,\dots,w_m)$ is the group of non-degenerate $m$-by-$m$ matrices with the $(i,j)$-entry being a polynomial of degree $w_i - w_j$, up to simultaneous rescaling.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.