In Hajime Urakawa's monograph The Spectral Geometry of the Laplacian on page 41, we make an assumption that I can't quite justify on my own. The following is our setup:

Let $(M^n,g)$ be a closed connected Riemannian manifold, with $\Delta_g$ the Laplacian (a negative operator), and $0=\lambda_0<\lambda_1\le\lambda_2\le\cdots$ the eigenvalues of $-\Delta_g$ with corresponding eigenfunctions $u_0=\hbox{const},u_1,u_2,u_3,\ldots$. Then for $N\gg0$, $$\iota:M\ni x\mapsto(u_1(x),\ldots,u_N(x))\in\mathbb R^N$$ defines an embedding.

But why is this true? I know that $(u_i)_{i\ge0}$ forms an orthonormal basis for $L^2(M,\mu_g)$, but this doesn't seem to be quite enough to prove that we can have an embedding. Presumably we need to show that we can also approximate functions in $H^1(M,g)$?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Interesting. Can you show that it's an immersion or injective for large $N$? $\endgroup$ – Ryan Unger Mar 1 '18 at 14:57

You can find a proof of this statement in S Bochner Analytic mappings of compact Riemannian space into Euclidean space Duke Math Journal vol 3 (1937) no 2 pages 339-354. An alternative approach (sketched) is to solve the heat equation for any smooth function as the initial condition using the eigenfunctions of the laplacian . For small time this solution of the heat equation will approximate the initial smooth function in the C^1 topology . Now truncate the eigenfunction expansion of the solution of the heat equation to show that any smooth function can be well approximated by a finite linear combination of eigenfunctions in the C^1 topology .This essentially proves the result.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.