18
$\begingroup$

Call a field $k$ unrepeatable$^1$ if for every field $L$ there are either zero or one field homomorphisms $k \to L$. Then the prime fields $\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{F}_p$ for $p$ prime are clearly unrepeatable and it seems very likely to me that those are the only ones. Is that true?

Notice that an unrepeatable field cannot have a non-identity automorphism, and must have a unique embedding into its algebraic closure (so for example $\mathbb{R}$ is not unrepeatable despite having no nontrivial automorphisms).


$^1$ I made up a term for it because the only name I know for these is the rather unwieldy "subterminal object in the opposite of the category of fields".

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Non-prime finite fields are not unrepeatable, since the Frobenius $x\mapsto x^p$ gives a nontrivial automorphism of every $\Bbb F_{p^k}$ with $k\ge2$. Indeed, I believe this shows that no non-prime field of positive characteristic is unrepeatable. $\endgroup$ – Greg Martin Feb 28 '18 at 5:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I definitely should have mentioned that, @GregMartin. (Minor correction: Frobenius endomorphism: it isn't always surjective. It's existence and non-identity-ness still shows unrepeatable positive characteristic fields are prime as you said.) $\endgroup$ – Omar Antolín-Camarena Feb 28 '18 at 5:21
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ A natural extension of the definition is to fix a field extension $k_0\to k$ and to say that $k$ is "unrepeatable" over $k_0$ if for every extension $k_0\to L$ there is at most one $k_0$-embedding $k\to L$. Then when $k_0$ is perfect, $k$ unrepeatable forces $k=k_0$. More generally this holds iff $k$ is a purely inseparable extension of $k_0$ (in the sense that $k$ belongs to the smallest perfect extension of $k_0$). I think this generality better emphasizes what happens (in the answer to the original question, prime fields being perfect, the role of perfectness doesn't show up explicitly). $\endgroup$ – YCor Feb 28 '18 at 10:43
15
$\begingroup$

It seems that indeed only prime fields are unrepeatable.

Proof: Let $k$ be unrepeatable and $F\subseteq k$ denote the prime field of $k$. Let $T\subseteq k$ be a transcendence base of $k/F$ and let $G=F(T)$. If $T\neq\emptyset$, then $G/F$ has non-trivial automorphisms (say take one element $t\in T$ to $t+1$). Since $k/G$ is algebraic this extends to a different embedding of $k$ into $\overline G$. Therefore, we see that $k/F$ must be algebraic.

It follows that $F\subseteq k\subseteq \overline{F}$ and since $k$ is unrepeatable (in $\overline F$), $k$ has to be fixed by all automorphisms in the absolute Galois group of $F$. But then $F=k$ and we are done.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How does the step of extending the automorphism of $G$ to one of $k$ work? I don't think it's true in general that you can extend automorphisms to algebraic extensions: the automorphism you mentioned of, say, $F(t)$ given by $t \mapsto t+1$, doesn't extend to $F(\sqrt{t})$, does it? $\endgroup$ – Omar Antolín-Camarena Feb 28 '18 at 6:01
  • $\begingroup$ (I guess that specific example does extend if $F$ has characteristic 2 because then $(\sqrt{t}+1)^2 = t+1$, but I'm pretty sure $t+1$ is not a square in $F(\sqrt{t})$ for other charactertistics.) $\endgroup$ – Omar Antolín-Camarena Feb 28 '18 at 6:04
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, I guess that step can be replaced by constructing two different homomorphisms $k \to \bar{G}$ to an algebraic closure of $G$! I think I'm happy with the proof after that change (or after an explanation of why my objection was wrong ;)). $\endgroup$ – Omar Antolín-Camarena Feb 28 '18 at 6:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @OmarAntolín-Camarena: you're right, what I had in mind was to extend that inside $\overline G$, but I did not write it down very well. I'll make the change. Thanks. $\endgroup$ – Sándor Kovács Feb 28 '18 at 6:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Transcendence base, eh? Does this result require the Axiom of Choice, then? $\endgroup$ – Gerald Edgar Feb 28 '18 at 12:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.