If $C$ is a category of fibrant objects, is its associated $\infty$-category idempotent complete, i.e. is it accessible? If this is not always true, besides from the case when it is an $n$-category for finite $n$, when is it true?
2 Answers
If the associated $\infty$-category $C$ is stable, one may consider all possible Verdier quotients, each of which would define a new structure of category of fibrant objects. The fact that all these Verdier quotients are idempotent-complete is equivalent to the vanishing of $K$-theory of $C$ in degree $-1$. Therefore, whenever you start from a singular algebraic variety of positive dimension, some Verdier quotient of the category of perfect complexes on the given variety $X$ gives an example of a category of fibrant objects which is idempotent-complete (as it consists of bounded complexes of vector bundles) but whose localization is not idempotent-complete, because $K_{-1}(X)$ is not zero.
This means that, even if the underlying category is very nice, essentially anything may happen, unless we are considering a Verdier quotient of a category whose $K$-theory vanishes in degree $-1$. This vanishing always occurs in the presence of a bounded $t$-structure. See the paper arXiv:1610.07207 by Antieau, Gepner and Heller.
No, that is not always true. One family of examples is discussed in this answer by Lennart Meier, but it can fail even more subtly. Consider a dual example of the category of finite simplicial sets which is a category of cofibrant objects. It is idempotent complete and weak equivalences are closed under retracts, but its associated $(\infty, 1)$-category is not idempotent complete due to Wall's finiteness obstruction.
A positive result is that it works if limits of towers of fibrations exist and the limit of such tower is a fibration, acyclic if all fibrations in the tower are acyclic. In that case the associated $(\infty, 1)$-category is countably complete. Unfortunately, I don't know any criterion that does not impose infinite limits.