2
$\begingroup$

Edit: This is a real coefficient version of the current post.

Is there a polynomial vector field $X$ with complex coefficients on $\mathbb{C}^2$ with the property quoted bellow?

There is a regular leaf $L$ whose holonomy, along at least one closed curve on it, is not trivial but $L$ does not intersect the real part $im (z)=im(w)=0,\;(z,w) \in \mathbb{C}^2$.

Note:

A leaf with non trivial holonomy is called a complex limit cycle, according to the terminology used in the video lecture by Ilyashenko described in the following answer:

The error in Petrovski and Landis' proof of the 16th Hilbert problem

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ When I saw your question I did the bet that you would eventually, at some point, edit its tags just to add "limitcycle". It's too predictable :) $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Feb 18 '18 at 0:30
  • $\begingroup$ @YCor Yes. As you have predicted, I could not resist myself from adding this tag:) $\endgroup$ Feb 18 '18 at 5:32
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @YCor I will just add that (limitcycle) seems to be renamed to (limit-cycles). I suppose that was your suggestion on meta - although I no longer can see the post, since it was deleted. $\endgroup$ Jan 20 '19 at 11:29
2
$\begingroup$

A revision: Novembre 2020

I am realy indebted to Loic Teyssier for his $2$ very valuable comments and suggestions. I summarize his comments as follows:

  1. To have a hyperbolic complex limit cycle it is not sufficient you check $\int_{\gamma} \alpha \neq 0$ but you should also check that this integral is different from $2k\pi i$

  2. If your example realy work, you can obtain a similar example with real coefficient if you replace $z^2+w^2+1=0$ with $(z^2+w^2-4i=0)$.

Now after more than one year of his suggestions, I look at my answer again.

His first comment leads me to compute the corresponding integral again. Then I just realiz that this integral is equal to $0$!. More over I realize that not only this example is not appropriate for the purpose of this question but also every possible reform of this example is not appropriate. For example consideration of $$ \begin{cases} z'=w+z(z^2+w^2-4i)\\ w'=-z+w(z^2+w^2-4i) \end{cases}$$ does not work. For all these examples the holonomy would be tangent to the identity maps. Hence a relevant question would be that: Are the corresponding leaf $z^2+w^2=4i$ is a leaf with non trivial holonomy?

His second comment help me to realize that the following system has a complex limit cycle $z^2+w^2+1=0$ which obviously does not intersect the real plane $\mathbb{R}^2$. Here is the true example as required as an answer to this post:

$$ \begin{cases} z'=w+z(z^2+w^2+1)\\ w'=-z+w(z^2+w^2+1) \end{cases}$$

Finally we include the following question in our answer:

Can a real polynomial vector field possess a hyperbolic complex limit cycle $\gamma$ which is not algebraic and does not intersect the real plane?


The previous version of my answer:

The answer to this question is yes. There is a complex polynomial vector field on $\mathbb{C}^2$ with a complex limit cycle which does not intersect the real plane $im(z)=im(w)=0$.

Consider the differential equation $$\begin{cases}z'=w+(z^2+w^2-4i)\\ w'=-z+(z^2+w^2-4i) \end{cases}$$

The regular leaf $L: z^2+w^2=4i$ of this singular foliation does not intersect the real part of $\mathbb{C}^2$. This leaf, which is topologically a cylinder, has a non trivial holonomy. In fact we have more: there is a closed curve on this leaf whose corresponding holonomy map is a hyperbolic map: namely the holonomy is not tangent to the identity map. Here is the argument:

The hyperbolicity, hence non triviality, of the holonomy of this leaf is a consequence of Theorem 3.2 Page 333 of the paper: First Variation of Holomorphic forms and some applications.

Elaboration: The foliation is defined by $$\omega= (w+(z^2+w^2-4i))dw-(-z+(z^2+w^2-4i))dz=0$$

To apply the theorem 3.2 in the above paper we find a $1-$ form $\alpha$ which satisfies $d\omega=\alpha \wedge \omega$, locally around an appropriate closed curve $\gamma$ in $L$.

Represent the above $1$- form $\omega$ in the form $\omega=Pdw-Qdz$. Then for $$\alpha=(P_z+Q_w)/(P^2+Q^2)(Pdz+Qdw)$$ we have $d\omega=\alpha \wedge \omega$. Note that $P^2+Q^2$ does not vanish on $L$. Now we have to compute $\int_{\gamma} \alpha$, along an appropriate closed curve $\gamma \subset L$, and show that this integral is non zero.

To compute this integral we parametrize the cylinder $L$ with
$$ \phi(t)= \begin{cases} z(t)=t+i/t\\w(t)=t/i+1/t \end{cases}$$ where $$\phi:\mathbb{C}\setminus \{0\}\to \mathbb{C}^2$$ is the global parametrization of $L$. We will see that the desired appropriate curve $\gamma$ is $\phi(S^1)$.

We denote by $\phi^*(\alpha) $, the pull back of $\alpha$ under embedding $\phi$. Now a very simple computation shows that $\int_{S^1} \phi^* \alpha$ is non zero since we obtain a pole of order 1 at the origin. In fact the later integral is $\int_{S^1} 2(z(t)+w(t))(wdz-zdw)$. An straightforward and short computation shows that we have a non degenerate pole, namely a pole of order 1. so the integral does not vanish. So the multiplier $e^{\int _{S^1} \alpha} $ is different from $1$. Then the leaf $L$ is a hyperbolic leaf. $\square$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.