6
$\begingroup$

How does the spin covariant derivative $\nabla^S_{\mu}$ act on gamma matrices satisfying: $\{\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}\} = g^{\mu\nu}$, i.e. $$\nabla^S_{\mu}\gamma^{\nu} = ?$$ where $\nabla^S := \partial + \omega^S$ is the spin covariant derivative associated to the spin connection $\omega^S$ on the spinor bundle $S \rightarrow M$.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ the answer you received on physics.stackexchange is not satisfactory? $\endgroup$ – Carlo Beenakker Feb 11 '18 at 23:42
  • $\begingroup$ @CarloBeenakker didn't get any, that's why posted here $\endgroup$ – phydev Feb 12 '18 at 11:31
6
$\begingroup$

The question is not clearly stated, but if appropriately interpreted it does make sense.

Let $S$ be a spinor bundle over a pseudo-Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$, whose bundle of Clifford algebras is denoted by $Cl(M,g)$. Since $S$ is a spinor bundle, there exists a morphism of bundles of associative, unital algebras:

$\gamma \colon Cl(M,g)\to End(S)$

to the endomorphisms of $S$. Let $\left\{ e_{\mu}\right\}$ be a local orthonormal frame of $TM$ over $U\subset M$. Using the injection $TM\subset Cl(M,g)$ we can apply $\gamma$ to $\left\{ e_{\mu}\right\}$:

$\gamma_{\mu} := \gamma(e_{\mu})\in End_U(S)\, ,$

obtaining what the physicists usually call the gamma matrices $\gamma_{\mu}$. Therefore, the gamma matrices are nothing but local sections of the endomorphism bundle of the spinor bundle obtained by Clifford multiplication with respect to an orthonormal frame.

Now, let $\nabla^S$ be a connection on $S$. To the question "how does $\nabla^S$ acts on the gamma matrices?" the answer is simple: it acts through the connection induced by $\nabla^S$ on the endomorphism bundle of $S$ by the usual formula, since we just saw that the gamma matrices are local sections of the endomorphism bundle of $S$. A more interesting question would be: Is $\nabla^S$ a module derivation with respect to Clifford multiplication?, that is, is the following formula satisfied:

$\nabla^S (\gamma(x) (\xi)) = (\nabla^S \gamma(x)) (\xi) + \gamma(x) (\nabla^S \xi) $

for all $x\in \Gamma(Cl(M,g))$ and $\xi\in \Gamma(S)$?. Here I am denoting by the same symbol the connection in $S$ and the induced connection on the endomorphism bundle. A more interesting situation happens when $\nabla^S$ is the lift of a metric connection $\nabla$ on $(M,g)$, which is the usual case in many applications. In this case, the natural question would be: is the following formula

$\nabla^S (\gamma(v) (\xi)) = ( \gamma(\nabla v)) (\xi) + \gamma(v) (\nabla^S \xi) $

satisfied for all $v\in \mathfrak{X}(M)\subset \Gamma(Cl(M,g))$ and $\xi\in \Gamma(S)$? That is, we wonder if $\nabla^S$ is a module derivation with respect to Clifford multiplication and in addition:

$\nabla^S \gamma(v) = \gamma(\nabla v)$

for all $v\in \mathfrak{X}(M)$. If both these conditions are satisfied, $\nabla^S$ is usually called a Clifford connection. For the case of $S$ being a spinor bundle associated to a spin structure and $\nabla^S$ being the lift of the Levi-Civita connection $\nabla$, one can see that $\nabla^S$ is indeed a Clifford connection and thus:

$\nabla^S\gamma_{\mu} = \nabla^S\gamma(e_{\mu}) = \gamma(\nabla e_{\mu}) = \mathcal{A}_{\mu\nu} \otimes \gamma( e_{\nu}) = \mathcal{A}_{\mu\nu} \otimes \gamma_{\nu}$

where $\nabla e_{\mu} = \mathcal{A}_{\mu\nu} \otimes e_{\nu}$. Hence, the gamma matrices behave as vectors (or one-forms) with respect the Levi-Civita connection when applying $\nabla^S$ and this tells you how the "spin covariant derivative" $\nabla^S$ acts on gamma matrices in the case of a Clifford connection lifting the Levi-Civita connection, which is probably the situation of interest for the OP.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.