2
$\begingroup$

Fix $a>0$ and $b>0$. Does the following ODE \begin{equation} G(x)^2+2axG(x)G'(x)+2aG'(x)(x-b)=0 \tag{*} \end{equation} have a solution, say, $F(x)$, that satisfies $F(x)>0$ and $F'(x)<0$ on $(b,\infty)$?

I tried to solve it by Mathematica, and it gives $G$ as solution to \begin{equation} x=e^{-2a\left(\text{log}\,G(x)-\frac{1}{G(x)}\right)}\left(C_0+b(2a)^{2a}\text{Gamma}\left(1-2a,\frac{2a}{G(x)}\right)\right) \tag{**} \end{equation}

for some free parameter $C_0$, where Gamma$(\cdot,\cdot)$ is the upper incomplete gamma function. However I'm not sure if this is a proper inverse function or if $G$ given by this equation has domain $(b,\infty)$.

Thanks!!

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The answer is yes: indeed, for any $a>0$ and $b>0$, your equation $(**)$ with any $C_0>0$ determines
a solution $G$ to your ODE $(*)$ such that $G>0$ and $G'<0$ on $(b,\infty)$ -- and even on $(0,\infty)$.

Indeed, rewrite $(**)$ as \begin{equation} x=X(G(x)),\quad X(g):= e^{-2a\left(\text{log}\,g-\frac{1}{g}\right)}\left(C_0+b(2a)^{2a}\text{Gamma}\left(1-2a,\frac{2a}{g}\right)\right). \end{equation} Take any $C_0>0$. Then $X(0+)=\infty$ and $X(\infty-)=0$. Let \begin{equation} x_1(g):=X'(g)\,\frac{g^2 e^{2 a \left(\log g-\frac{1}{g}\right)}}{g+1}. \end{equation} Then \begin{equation} x'_1(g)=-\frac{2 a b e^{-\frac{2 a}{g}} g^{2 a}}{(g+1)^2}, \end{equation} which is manifestly negative for positive $a,b,g$, so that $X'<0$ on the interval $(0,\infty)$ and
hence the function $X\colon(0,\infty)\to(0,\infty)$ continuously decreases from $\infty$ to $0$ on $(0,\infty)$. So, the inverse function $G:=X^{-1}$ exists and solves the equation $x=X(G(x))$ for $x>0$. Moreover, $G>0$ and $G'=1/(X'\circ G)<0$, as desired.

It remains to verify that this function $G$ is a solution to your ODE $(*)$. To do this, just replace, in $(*)$, $G(x)$ by $g$ and $G'(x)$ by $1/X'(g)$, and then $x$ by $X(g)$, so that $(*)$ is rewritten as $g^2 + 2 a X(g) \frac g{X'(g)} + 2 \frac a{X'(g)}\, (X(g) - b)=0$, which is straightforward to check.

Details of calculations can be seen in the Mathematica notebook and/or its pdf image.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your reply! I'll spend some time to read it. Is it possible, though, to have $F>1$ (I just edited it) instead of $F>0$ in the old post ? $\endgroup$
    – Jackie Lu
    Feb 11, 2018 at 3:45
  • $\begingroup$ Actually please ignore my last comment. $F>0$ is what I wanted. I got confused. $\endgroup$
    – Jackie Lu
    Feb 11, 2018 at 3:58
  • $\begingroup$ All right. Actually, if you follow the lines of the proof, you will see that it is impossible to get $F>1$ in any neighborhood of $\infty$. $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2018 at 4:02
  • $\begingroup$ How did you get Out[99] in the pdf image? I get "Limit[X[g], g -> [Infinity], Assumptions -> True]" when I run the command. $\endgroup$
    – Jackie Lu
    Feb 11, 2018 at 4:21
  • $\begingroup$ Also I get a much more complicated expression for $x_1'$. $\endgroup$
    – Jackie Lu
    Feb 11, 2018 at 4:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.