8
$\begingroup$

Good morning,

I've came across this question during my researches. It seems apparently very simple, however I Googled a bit and I couldn't find the answer I was looking for.

The question is as follows: Is it true that any connected subgroup of $GL(d,\mathbb{R})$ admits at least one compact orbit on the sphere $\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$ (or, if you prefer, on the projective space $\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{R}^d))$?

Well, of course this is true if the subgroup is of the form $e^{tA},t\in\mathbb{R}$, but for more complicated subgroups I don't know. I guess that the main point that prevents the use of standard methods is that the subgroup is not, in general, (Zariski) closed. Thus many powerful results are not available. Nonetheless, I'm still guessing that the answer should be yes, but I cannot prove it.

If you can provide me with references, or showing me counter-examples, that would be great!

Thanks in advance for your kindness.

Regards

EDIT: in response to the comments below, I would like to narrow a bit the question.

In fact, what I am really interested in is the following setting: take any Lie subalgebra $\mathfrak{a}$ of $\mathfrak{gl}(d,\mathbb{R})$, and consider the subgroup $G$ of $GL(d,\mathbb{R})$ generated by $\mathfrak{a}$, so to avoid nasty possibilities. Nonetheless, $G$ need not be algebraic.

Also, for any $g\in G$, the action on the sphere is intended to be $x\mapsto \frac{gx}{\|gx\|}$, for any $x\in\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ I'm a bit confused - how is an arbitrary subgroup of $GL(d,\mathbb{R})$ supposed to act on the unit sphere? $\endgroup$
    – Mark Grant
    Commented Mar 27, 2018 at 8:44
  • $\begingroup$ I guess you could first retract to $SO(n)$ (by connectedness), but then the question would really only be about subgroups of $SO(n)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 27, 2018 at 9:35
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I guess, for $A\in GL(d,\mathbb{R})$ we consider the action $x\mapsto Ax/\|Ax\|$ on the unit sphere. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 27, 2018 at 9:56
  • $\begingroup$ @FedorPetrov Yes, indeed this is what I meant, thank you for the clarification. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 27, 2018 at 10:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The parenthesis around Zariski clearly indicate you do not assume algebraic, But do you assume the subgroup to be closed (a Lie subgroup ?) or path-connected ?. Apparently, there are nasty examples otherwise ( projecteuclid.org/download/pdf_1/euclid.ijm/1256063578 ) $\endgroup$
    – user120527
    Commented Mar 27, 2018 at 10:22

1 Answer 1

1
+50
$\begingroup$

Yes, it is true that for every continuous real linear finite dimensional representation of a connected Lie group there exists a closed orbit for the associated projective representation.

To see this it is enough to assume the group is solvable (as every connected Lie group has a cocompact solvable subgroup) and the representation is irreducible and faithful. It follows that the unipotent radical of the Zariski closure is trivial, thus our group is diagonalizable and the representation is either 1 or 2-dimensional. The 1-dim case is trivial and in the 2-dim case we get that the action on the projective line is transitive.


Here are some more details.

Let $A$ be the connected, simply connected Lie group associated with the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{a}$. The inclusion map $\mathfrak{a}\to \mathfrak{gl}_d(\mathbb{R})$ gives rise to a continuous homomorphism $A\to \text{GL}_d(\mathbb{R})$. The connected group alluded to in the (edited) question is the image of $A$ under this continuous homomorphism. Thus we need to show that for every linear representation of a connected Lie group, the associated projective action has a closed orbit.

It is enough to show that a cocompact subgroup of $A$ has a closed orbit, as a cocompact subgroup (the stabilizer of a point in this orbit) of a cocompact subgroup is cocompact. Now, use the fact that every connected Lie group has a cocompact solvable subgroup. This is a standard fact (by factoring the solvable radical it is enough to observe this fact for adjoint semi-simple Lie groups, which are in fact real algebraic groups, then it is reduced to Borel's fixed point theorem, which is nothing but the "Zariski closed version of this question" which you seem to be aware of). We thus need to prove the claim: for every linear representation of a connected solvable group, the associated projective action has a closed orbit. Obviously, it is enough to assume the representation is irreducible.

We thus need to prove the claim: for every continuous irreducible finite dimensional real linear representation of a connected solvable group $A$, the associated projective action has a closed orbit. Irreducible representations of solvable groups are either one or two dimensional. This follows for example from Lie-Kolchin (for an invariant line $\mathbb{C}\cdot v$ in the complexification, take the space generated by $v+\bar{v}$ and $v-\bar{v}$). In the 1-dim case the corresponding projective space is a singleton, and there is nothing to prove. in the 2-dim case the projective space is a topologically a circle. We are done by noting that the action of a connected group on a circle is either transitive or have a fixed point. Indeed, its orbits are homogeneous connected subsets, thus points or open intervals, and in the latter case any end point of the interval will be fixed.

$\endgroup$
14
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your reply. I've awarded the bounty to your answer already, but I would like to take some time before accepting it, because I would like to check myself your explanation. This will take me some time, since I'm not an expert. If you feel like adding some more details, please go ahead, that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you again! -Guido- $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 1, 2018 at 12:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @guido, With pleasure. My answer was indeed brief, as I am currently traveling and do not have much time, but I will provide more details when I am back. It will help me if you could let me know the less clear parts on your side. $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    Commented Apr 2, 2018 at 7:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @guido, I added details. Please let me know if anything remains unclear. $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    Commented Apr 3, 2018 at 23:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The 1-2 dimensiinality is an artifact of the reduction steps in the proof. (varying the acting group) you can have compact orbits of unbounded dimension, as the example of the standard rep of SL_n shows. $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    Commented Apr 4, 2018 at 10:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ OK, I understand that what you miss is the fact that every semisimple Lie group has a solvable cocompact subgroup. A quick way to see that is by taking the minimal parabolic subgroup in it, which is cocompact, and to note that the minimal parabolic itself has a normal cocompact solvale subgroup. These two facts should appear in any good book regarding semisimple Lie groups. $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    Commented Aug 14, 2018 at 10:38

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .