5
$\begingroup$

Denote the classical Kloosterman and Salié sums, respectively, as $KL(a,b) = \sum_{r \in F_*} e(ar+\frac{b}{r})$ and $SL(a,b) =\sum_{r \in F_*} \chi(r) e(ar+\frac{b}{r})$, where $\chi(\cdot)$ is the quadratic character. It follows from Weil's proof of the Riemann hypothesis for curves (or more elementary considerations in the case of $SL(a,b)$) that for $a,b \neq 0$ that $|K(a,b)|, |SL(a,b)| \lesssim |F|^{1/2}$.

Informally, I'd like to know if we can prove square root cancellation in the composition of a Kloosterman (respectively, Salié) sum with a rational function. In particular:

Let $R(t)$ be a rational function in $t$. For $b \neq 0$ can one prove $$ |\sum_{t \in F}'KL(R(t),b)|\lesssim |F|$$ and/or $$|\sum_{t \in F}'SL(R(t),b) \lesssim |F|$$ where $\sum'$ denotes the exclusion of the poles of $R(t)$. Of course the implicit constant should depend on $R$ but be independent of the field?

I'm particularly interested in the special case when the numerator and denominator of $R$ have degree $2$, but would be very interested in the general case as well.

There's been a lot of work by Bombeiri, Deligne, Hooley, Katz, Sperber, and others on deducing multivariate exponential sum estimates from Deligne's theorems, but many of these theorems are hard to parse for someone who isn't an expert in algebraic geometry. I'd also be interested in the above sums twisted by a multiplicative character in $t$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It seems a result of Fouvry and Michel (infoscience.epfl.ch/record/129095/files/somexp.pdf) combined with a result of Hooley (which they seem to be implicitly claiming without proof extends to rational functions) reduces matters to showing that xR(t)+x^{-1} isn't the composition of bivariate rational function with a linear fractional transformation over the closure of F[T]. $\endgroup$ – Mark Lewko Jan 10 '18 at 6:49
2
$\begingroup$

It's fine for Kloosterman sums, as long as R is non-constant. The simplest argument (formally) being to use Deligne's general form of the Riemann Hypothesis. Briefly, KL(R(t),b) is the trace function of the sheaf R^*Kl, where Kl is the Kloosterman sheaf of rank 2 defined by Deligne. Katz has shown that the geometric monodromy group of that is SL_2, so R^*Kl has the same geometric monodromy group (a priori it could become a finite-index subgroup, but SL_2 has no finite-index algebraic subgroup). Then the Grothendieck-Lefschetz trace formula and the Riemann Hypothesis apply to get what you want. This kind of things is sketched in Section 6 of the Polymath8 paper (see, e.g., Prop. 6.11), or in "A study in sums of products" by Fouvry-Kowalski-Michel, among other places, and the same argument applies with a twist by a multiplicative character

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! Even as a sketch, could you expand on this with references to the explicit theorems you are applying and how they fit together? $\endgroup$ – Mark Lewko Jan 10 '18 at 18:58
  • $\begingroup$ Sure, I'll either write it here or send you a quick email. $\endgroup$ – Denis Chaperon de Lauzières Jan 10 '18 at 20:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.