10
$\begingroup$

Let $F(x,y) = a_3 x^3 + a_2x^2 y + a_1 xy^2 + a_0 y^3$ be a binary cubic form, say with real coefficients. Put $H(x,y) = H_F(x,y)$ for the Hessian covariant of $F$, defined by

$$\displaystyle H_F(x,y) = \frac{1}{4} \begin{vmatrix} F_{xx} & F_{xy} \\ F_{xy} & F_{yy} \end{vmatrix},$$

and put

$$\displaystyle G(x,y) = G_F(x,y) = \begin{vmatrix} F_x & F_y \\ H_x & H_y \end{vmatrix}.$$

$H,G$ are both covariants of $F$ under the substitution action of $\operatorname{GL}_2$, and in particular, $H, G, F$ and the invariant $\Delta(F)$, the discriminant of $F$, generate the ring of polynomial covariants. They are connected by a single syzygy, given by

$$\displaystyle 4H(x,y)^3 + G(x,y)^2 = -27 \Delta(F) F(x,y)^2.$$

As can be verified by immediate calculation, we have

$$\displaystyle \Delta(G) = 729 \Delta(F)^3,$$

which is a perfect cube.

My question is, suppose that $G$ is a binary cubic form with integer coefficients satisfying $\Delta(G) = 729 n^3$ for some non-zero integer $n$. Does it follow that $G$ is the $G_F$-covariant for some binary cubic form $F$ with integer (rational) coefficients? If not, what is a counter-example, and what would be a stricter condition that guarantees $G$ is such a covariant?

On a related note, if $G'$ is the non-trivial cubic covariant of $G_F$, then $G' = -729 \Delta(F)^2 F(x,y)$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Shouldn't the involutive property you noted at the end answer your surjectivity question? $\endgroup$ – Abdelmalek Abdesselam Dec 28 '17 at 22:02
6
$\begingroup$

As Abdelmalek notes, if $G$ is to be the cubic covariant $G_F$ of another form $F$, and has a nonzero discriminant of the expected shape $\Delta(G)=3^6n^3$, then $F$ must divide $G'=G_G$ - indeed the only candidate (comparing discriminants and exploiting homogeneity) is $F=-G_G/(3^6n^2)$, which will have rational coefficients when $n$ is rational, and integral coefficients when (and only when) those of $G_G$ are integral multiples of $3^6n^2$.

And when this is the case, this $F$ does indeed work: $$G_F = -G_{G_G}/(3^6n^2)^3 = 3^6\Delta(G)^2G/(3^{18}n^6) = 3^6(3^6n^3)^2G/(3^{18}n^6) = G\,.$$

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Not exactly an answer but some elaboration on the remark at the end of the OP's question. It seems to me that if an $F$ exists such that $G=G_F$ then taking the cubicovariant of $G$ should allow us to recover the candidate $F$ modulo a little bit of algebra/arithmetic.

The operation $F\rightarrow$ the cubicovariant $G_F$ essentially is an involution. Namely, the cubicovariant of the cubicovariant should be a numerical multiple of $F\times \Delta(F)^2$. See the Maple calculation below (using a routine for calculating transvectants courtesy of Jaydeep Chipalkatti): enter image description here

enter image description here

enter image description here

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.