5
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal I$ be a $\sigma$-ideal with Borel base on an uncountable Polish space $X=\bigcup\mathcal I$.

Let $\mathrm{cov}(\mathcal I)$ (resp. $\mathrm{cov}_\sqcup(\mathcal I)$) be the smallest cardinality of a cover of $X$ by (parvise disjoint) Borel sets that belong to the ideal $\mathcal I$.

The cardinal $\mathrm{cov}(\mathcal I)$ is one of four classical cardinal characteristics of an ideal. What about its disjoint modification? Was it considered in the literature?

Observe the following trivial relations between the cardinals $\mathrm{cov}(\mathcal I)$ and $\mathrm{cov}_\sqcup(\mathcal I)$:

1) $\mathrm{cov}(\mathcal I)\le\mathrm{cov}_\sqcup(\mathcal I)$;

2) If $\mathrm{cov}(\mathcal I)\le\omega_1$, then $\mathrm{cov}(\mathcal I)=\mathrm{cov}_\sqcup(\mathcal I)$.

Problem 1. Is $\mathrm{cov}(\mathcal I)=\mathrm{cov}_\sqcup(\mathcal I)$?

This problem is especially interesting for the ideal $\mathcal M$ of meager subsets of the real line and for the ideal $\mathcal N$ of Lebesgue null sets in $\mathbb R$.

Problem 2. Are the strict inequalities $\mathrm{cov}(\mathcal M)<\mathrm{cov}_\sqcup(\mathcal M)$ and $\mathrm{cov}(\mathcal N)<\mathrm{cov}_\sqcup(\mathcal N)$ consistent?

The negative answer to the second part of problem 2 would give an affirmative answer to Problem 8 of this MO post.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If $\mathcal I$ is closed under taking arbitrary subsets, then any family $\mathcal A$ of sets in $\mathcal I$ can be made into a disjoint family $\mathcal A'$ of set in $\mathcal I$ with $\bigcup \mathcal A = \bigcup \mathcal A'$. (Just enumerate $\mathcal A = \{A_\alpha : \alpha < \kappa\}$ and put $A'_\alpha = A_\alpha \setminus (\bigcup_{\beta < \alpha}A_\beta)$.) $\endgroup$ – Will Brian Nov 16 '17 at 19:24
  • $\begingroup$ In the linked post, what makes things so hard (and interesting!) is that you're only looking at the closed sets in $\mathcal I$, so this trick doesn't work. $\endgroup$ – Will Brian Nov 16 '17 at 19:26
  • $\begingroup$ @WillBrian Please note that I am requiring the pieces to be Borel! But your trick does not produce Borel sets (especially for $\kappa>\omega_1$). $\endgroup$ – Taras Banakh Nov 16 '17 at 19:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @WillBrian What I realized is that $\acute{\mathfrak n}$ is equal to the smallest cadinality of a disjoint compact cover of any non $\sigma$-compact absolute Borel space (just use the fact that each absolute Borel space is a continuous injective image of a Polish space). So, in a sense $\acute{\mathfrak n}$ is a universal "constant". It would be interesting to know what happens with $\acute{\mathfrak n}$ for analytic non-Borel spaces. $\endgroup$ – Taras Banakh Nov 16 '17 at 19:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @WillBrian On the other hand, the cardinal $\acute{\mathfrak m}$ is equal to the product $\acute{\mathfrak n}\cdot\mathrm{cov}_\sqcup(\mathcal N)$, so is reducible in a sense. This was a motivation for my question on $cov_\sqcup(\mathcal I)$. $\endgroup$ – Taras Banakh Nov 16 '17 at 19:39

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.