8
$\begingroup$

Differentials of the second kind

Gross and Rohrlich in the paper On the periods of abelian integrals and a formula of Chowla and Selberg state the claim below without citation (pg. 198), giving an explicit determination of the cohomology classes of the Fermat curve $X_d := \{x^d + y^d - z^d = 0\} \subset \mathbb{P}^2$ using differentials of the second kind.

Working on the affine chart $\{z=1\} \subset \mathbb{P}^2$ they define the following meramorphic 1-forms on $X_d$: $$ \eta_{r,s,t} = x^{r-1}y^{s-d} \mathrm{d} x. $$ These forms can be integrated over homology classes, giving the cohomology classes that we need.

Claim: The middle cohomology of $X_d$ is generated by $\eta_{r,s,t}$ where $0 < r,s,t < d$ and $r+s+t \equiv 0 \,(\text{mod } d)$.

Example: Let $d=3$. Then, $X_3$ is elliptic and we have $\mathrm{H}^1(X_3,\mathbb{C}) = \langle \frac{\mathrm{d}x}{y^2} , \frac{x\mathrm{d}x}{y}\rangle$.

Main problem: How does one prove the claim above?

Perhaps using Griffiths residues

We could try to prove this statement using the Griffiths' residue map: $$ \operatorname{res}: \bigoplus_{\ell \ge 1} \mathrm{H}^0(\mathbb{P}^2,\Omega_{\mathbb{P}^2}(\ell X_d)) \to \mathrm{H}^1(X_d,\mathbb{C}), $$ which implies that the residues of the following meramorphic forms generate the image: $$ \omega_{r,s,t} = \frac{x^{r-1}y^{s-1}z^{t-1}}{(x^d+y^d-z^d)^\ell }\cdot \Omega, $$ where $0 < r,s,t < d$, $r+s+t = \ell d$ and $\Omega = x \mathrm{d}y\mathrm{d}z - y \mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}z + z\mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}y$.

Therefore it remains to integrate the forms $\omega_{r,s,t}$ over a suitable tubular neighbourhood of $X_d$. Representation theoretic arguments imply that $\operatorname{res} \omega_{r,s,t} = c_{r,s,t} \eta_{r,s,t}$ for a scalar $c_{r,s,t} \in \mathbb{C}^*$, provided Gross and Rohrlich are correct.

However, an explicit computation reveals that the residue of $\omega_{r,s,t}$ is in fact a scalar multiple of $x^{r-1}y^{s-\ell d} \mathrm{d}x$ instead of $x^{r-1}y^{s-d} \mathrm{d}x$. Therefore we can answer Question 1 if we can answer the following.

Equivalent problem: How can we lower the pole order of $x^{r-1}y^{s-\ell d} \mathrm{d}x$ modulo cohomological equivalence to get $x^{r-1}y^{s-d}\mathrm{d}x$?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

If I recall correctly, you can find a proof of the claim in Lang's book "Introduction to Algebraic and Abelian Functions". He has a chapter on the Fermat curve and in fact (after looking at the google preview of the book) I think that the claim is essentially Theorem 2.2 in Chapter II of Lang's book.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.