4
$\begingroup$

Let $d=d_1+d_2$, $s_1,s_2>0$, $p>1$ and $(x_1,x_2)\in \mathbb{R}^{d_1}\times \mathbb{R}^{d_2}$, $(\xi_1,\xi_2)\in \mathbb{R}^{d_1}\times \mathbb{R}^{d_2}$. Define $$ W^{s_1,s_2}_{p}:=\left\{f: f=\mathcal{F}^{-1}\left(\frac{\mathcal{F}g(\xi)}{1+|\xi_1|^{s_1}+|\xi_2|^{s_2}}\right);\forall g\in L^p(\mathbb{R}^{d}) \right\}. $$

Is there any reference talk about the Sobolev embedding theorem for this kind of space? say, under which condition one can get $$ W^{s_1,s_2}_{p}\hookrightarrow L^\infty. $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ There are p1 and p2 in the notation but p in the definition $\endgroup$ – almaz Nov 10 '17 at 1:13
  • $\begingroup$ @almaz Thank you for your comment. I have modified the definition. $\endgroup$ – Guohuan Zhao Nov 10 '17 at 6:58
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't $min(s_1,s_2) p>n$ enough to ensure the embedding you want? $\endgroup$ – almaz Nov 10 '17 at 23:53
  • $\begingroup$ @almaz of course $\min\{s_1, s_2\}p>d$ can ensure the embedding. I think the condition should be $\frac{d_1}{s_1p}+\frac{d_2}{s_2p}<1$, but I can't prove it. $\endgroup$ – Guohuan Zhao Nov 12 '17 at 9:24
3
$\begingroup$

There are several ways to proceed. Maybe the most elegant (if you are functional-analysis minded) is to use the fact that in $\mathbb{R}^d$ $(-\Delta)^{\alpha}$, for $0 < \alpha \leq 1$ is the generator of a Markovian semigroup satisfying Sobolev inequalities with ''dimensional constant'' given by $\alpha^{-1} \, d$. This can be seen by subordination, see the Chapter II of [1].

With that in mind, assume $s_1 < s_2$ and fix $$ \alpha = \frac{s_1}{s_2}. $$ Now, the operator $A = (-\Delta_{d_1})^{\alpha} + (-\Delta_{d_2})$ generates a Markovian semigroup over $\mathbb{R}^{d_1} \times \mathbb{R}^{d_2}$ with dimensional constant given by $d' = d_1 \alpha^{-1} + d_2$. Your anisotropic Sobolev space will be $W^{s_2,p}_{A}(\mathbb{R}^{d_1} \times \mathbb{R}^{d_2})$ and writing the Sobolev embedding for the new dimension $d'$ gives the result.

Alternatively, you could prove directly the embedding for $p=2$ using the Plancherel inequality to see that any $f \in W^{p,s_1, s_2}$ has integrable Fourier transform for the right set of parameters. Indeed $$ \int_{\mathbb{R}^d} |\widehat{f}(\xi)| d\xi = \int_{\mathbb{R}^d} (1 + |\xi_1|^{s_1} + |x_2|^s_2)^{-1} (1 + |\xi_1|^{s_1} + |x_2|^s_2) |\widehat{f}(\xi)| d\xi, $$ and applying the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality for $s_1$ and $s_2$ such that $(1 + |\xi_1|^{s_1} + |x_2|^s_2)^{-1} \in L^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$ gives the desired embedding. A complex interpolation argument will then give the result for $2 < p$ and duality for the Fourier multiplier of symbol $(1 + |\xi_1|^{s_1} + |x_2|^s_2)^{-1}$ will give its $L^1 \to L^2$ boundedness.

Varopoulos, N.Th.; Saloff-Coste, L.; Coulhon, T., Analysis and geometry on groups, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (ISBN 978-0-521-08801-5/pbk). xii, 156 p. (2008). ZBL1179.22009.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.