1
$\begingroup$

Let $S_n$ and $T_m$ be two binomial variables satisfying $S_n\sim B(n,\frac12)$ and $T_m\sim B(m,\frac12)$. Define $\tilde{S}_n=\frac{2S_n-n}{\sqrt{n}}$ and define $\tilde{T}_m$ similarly. For any fixed $s$ and $t$, it is well-known that (Central Limit Theorem) $$\mathbb \lim_{n,m\rightarrow\infty}(\mathbb P(\tilde S_n\le s),\mathbb P(\tilde T_m\le t))=(\Phi(s),\Phi(t)),$$ where $\Phi(x)=\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{x}\exp(-\frac{z^2}{2})dz$ is the distribution function of a standard normal variable.

Let $c=c_{n,m}=\mathbb E(\tilde{S}_n\tilde{T}_m)$ for short. Here $c$ may depend on $n$ and $m$.

Suppose that $\alpha\le c_{n,m}\le\beta$ holds uniformly for two absolute constants $\alpha,\beta\in(0,1)$. For fixed $s$ and $t$, it "seems reasonable" to conjecture that the joint distribution of $\tilde S_n$ and $\tilde T_m$ is close to corresponding 2-dimensional normal distribution: \begin{equation}\label{close} \mathbb P(\tilde S_n\le s,\tilde T_m\le t)=(1+o(1))\hat\Phi_c(s,t),~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(*) \end{equation} where $o(1)$ tends to 0 as $n,m$ tend to infinity and $\hat\Phi_c(s,t)$ is defined by $$\hat\Phi_c(s,t)=\frac1{2\pi\sqrt{1-c^2}}\iint_{x\le s,~y\le t}\exp\left[-\frac{x^2-2cxy+y^2}{2(1-c^2)}\right]dxdy.$$

Here are my questions:

$1.$ Is it sufficient to guarantee $(*)$ hold that $\alpha\le c\le\beta$. How about $c=\alpha$?

$2.$ If $1.$ is ture, can $o(1)$ term in $(*)$ be improved ($O(\frac1{\sqrt{n}}+\frac1{\sqrt{m}})$ for example)?

$3.$ If $1.$ is not true, can we get a good estimation of $\mathbb P(\tilde S_n\le s,\tilde T_m\le t)$ for fixed $s$ and $t$?

$\bf{Remark:}$ This problem is one of my attempts to solve Link. Any hint or reference will be appreciated. :)

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I think this is much too much ask for.

Here is a construction that is not a complete counter-example, but indicates why it shouldn't be true. let $(Z^1_n)$ and $(Z^2_n)$ be two i.i.d. sequences of Bernoulli(1/2) trials. Now let $U_n$ and $V_n$ be i.i.d sequences of random variables taking the value 1 with probability 1/2 and 2 with the probability 1/2. Finally, set \begin{align*} S_n&=\sum_{i=1}^n Z^{U_n}_i\text{ and }\\ T_n&=\sum_{i=1}^n Z^{V_n}_i. \end{align*} These have the correct marginal distributions. Now $c_{n,n}=\frac 12$ for each $n$. The reason this is not a counterexample is that $c_{m,n}$ does not stay bounded away from 0 and 1 if $m$ and $n$ are not comparable.

Fairly clearly, $(\tilde S_n,\tilde T_n)$ is approximately a mixture of a 2-dimensional normal random variable (where the components are independent) and a 1-dimensional normal random variable, supported on the diagonal.

In particular, if $a$ is very negative, you have $\mathbb{P}(\tilde S_n<a,\tilde T_n<a)\approx \frac 12 \mathbb{P}(\tilde S_n<a)$, which is far bigger than the estimate you are looking for.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.