Something I really enjoy about Tao's writing is that he proves the same theorem over and over. While I complain a bit sometimes about clarity, this is a heuristic that I very much believe in.

This question is about the Wigner Semi-Circle Law from his 254A random matrix theory. He does it two different ways:

  • for a broad class of matrix ensembles Notes 4
  • for a Gaussian Ensembles Notes 6

They are Hermitan matrices: $M = \overline{M}^\dagger$ (equal to it's own adjoint) with elements $\xi_{ij}$ chosen under special conditions:

  • $\xi_{ij} = \overline{\xi_{ji}}$ is a complex variable, zero mean $\mathbb{E}[\xi_{ij}] = 0$ and unit variance $\mathbb{E}[\xi_{ij}^2] = 1$
  • Diagonal matrics $\xi_{ii} \in \mathbb{R}$ with bounded mean and variance.

So that semi-circle theorem works under very broad conditions, but let's set $\xi_{ij}$ and $\xi_{ii}$ be appropriate $\mathcal{N}(0,1)$ random variables. Before getting to the "main" proof in Notes 6, there are some rather unique and technical estimates that I'm going to skip, basically 90% of the proof.

He shows that GUE is a determinantal process with kernel basic on Hermite polynomials:

$$ K_n(x,x) = \sum_{j=0}^{n-1} \phi_j(x)^2 = \phi'_n(x)^2 + (n - x^2/4)\phi_n(x)^2 $$

with a related formula for $\mathbb{E}(\mu_{M_n/\sqrt{n}})$ . He explains to us the various notions of convergence for probability measures and how these interplay with matrix norms in general. And works a few of these cases out.

I recognize the Hermite polynomials (weighted with Gaussians) $$ L_h \phi = - h^2 \phi'' + \frac{x^2}{4} \phi = \left(- h^2 \frac{d^2}{dx^2} + \frac{x^2}{4} \right)\phi $$

Intuitively, I can picture what this "phase space" should look like. There should be a coordinate axis marked "$x$" and a momentum axis marked "$p$" and the Hamiltonian should read:

$$ L_h = p^2 + x^2/4 \leq 1 \text{ with }p = - i\hbar \frac{d}{dx} $$

which is indeed a circle (rather... an ellipse). There's some sort of projection operator: $$ \pi_{V_n} = L_{1/\sqrt{n}} \Big|_{[0,1]} =_{symbol} \dots (4-x^2)_+^{1/2}$$ Unfortunately, Tao warns us this requires semi-classical analysis or even microlocal analysis.

What does he mean by that? He does some type of "WKB approximation" except that's also not rigorous. So he settles for a mix of

  • variation of parameters
  • Gronwall's inequality
  • steepest descent

Google searching for "microlocal" analysis leads me astray. I found work of Kashiwara which I shall not even mention here...

How does WKB fail to be rigorous? What kind of machinery gets introduced with microlocal analysis?


You need the theory of $h$-pseudodifferential operators.

Standard references are:

  1. "Spectral Asymptotics in the Semi-Classical Limit" by Dimassi and Sjöstrand.
  2. "An Introduction to Semiclassical and Microlocal Analysis" by Martinez.
  3. "Semiclassical analysis" by Zworski.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.