I am working on the following SDE (but we will dealing only with deterministic object: $\omega\in\Omega$ is fixed): \begin{equation}\label{sde}%sde x_t=\underbrace{\xi_0+\int_0^tb(s,x_s)\,ds+\int_0^t\sigma(s,x_s)\,dW_s}_{=:z_t}+y_t \end{equation} where $y_t=\sup_{0\le s\le t}(z_s)^{-}$ is the regulator term which ensures that the positivity constraint is respected and the stochastic integral is a Young integral.

Let us suppose everything real valued.

The following hypothesis are considered: $\xi_0>0$ is fixed, \begin{align*} &b:[0,L]\times\Bbb R\to\Bbb R\;\;\;\;,\\ &\sigma:[0,L]\times\Bbb R\to\Bbb R \end{align*} are measurable and bounded functions which satisfy \begin{equation}\label{hyp1}%hyp1 |b(t,x)-b(t,y)|\le K_0|x-y|\;\;\forall x,y\in\Bbb R,\;\forall t\in[0,L] \end{equation} \begin{equation}\label{hyp2}%hyp2 |\sigma(t,x)-\sigma(t,y)|\le K_0|x-y|\;\;\forall x,y\in\Bbb R,\;\forall t\in[0,L] \end{equation} \begin{equation}\label{hyp3}%hyp3 |\sigma(t,x)-\sigma(s,x)|\le K_0|t-s|^{\nu}\;\;\forall x\in\Bbb R,\;\forall s,t\in[0,L] \end{equation} where $\nu\in]\frac12,1]$ and $K_0>0$.

Hence, both $b$ and $\sigma$ are Lipschitz in space, moreover $\sigma$ is $\nu$-Holder continous in time.

Next we take a fractional Brownian motion $W$ of Hurst parameter $H$ that is, $W\in\mathcal C^{H-\varepsilon}([0,L],\Bbb R)$ for every $\varepsilon>0$, with $1/2<H\le\nu$.

We will consider an arbitrary fixed trajectory of this FBM (i.e. $\omega$ is fixed and we mean $W=W(\omega)$).

Then it is proved that for every fixed $\lambda\in]\frac12,H[$, the equation at the beginning admits a solution $x$ such that, a.s. $x(\omega)\in\mathcal C^{\lambda}([0,L],\Bbb R)$.

We summarize here the relations between the parameters considered above, in order to be clear: $$ \frac12<\lambda<H\le\nu\le1\;\;. $$

I would like to prove uniqueness for this SDE.

In the following we will consider $x^{(1)},x^{(2)}$ two $\lambda$-solutions of the SDE on $[0,L]$, writing $z^{(i)},y^{(i)}$ with the obvious meaning: $x^{(i)}=z^{(i)}+y^{(i)}\;\;i=1,2$.

We will take $0\le T\le L$, which will be chosen conveniently later.

I will skip the details (if someone is interested, tell me this!) in order not to annoy you, going directly to the core of the problem: setting $$ H_T:=\|x^{(1)}-x^{(2)}\|_{\infty,[0,T]} $$ I was able to prove that $$ H_T\le2K_0H_TT+\eta_TT^{\lambda+H-\varepsilon} $$ where $$ \eta_T:=K_0\|W\|_{H-\varepsilon,[0,T]}\left(\|x^{(1)}\|_{\infty,[0,T]}+\|x^{(2)}\|_{\infty,[0,T]}+2T^{1-\lambda}\right) $$ which is a bounded non-negative increasing function of $T$.

Now from this I got $$ \frac{H_T}{\eta_TT^{\lambda+H-\varepsilon}}\le\frac1{1-2K_0T} $$ and thus, passing to the $\limsup_{T\to0+}$ we get \begin{align*} 1 &=\limsup_{T\to0+}\frac1{1-2K_0T}\\ &\ge\limsup_{T\to0+}\frac{H_T}{\eta_TT^{\lambda+H-\varepsilon}}\\ &\ge\limsup_{T\to0+}\frac{|x_T^{(1)}-x_T^{(2)}|}{\eta_TT^{\lambda+H-\varepsilon}} \end{align*} and setting $f_t:=x_t^{(1)}-x_t^{(2)}$ we have that $f_0=0$ and $f\in\mathcal C^{\lambda}[0,L]$, thus the last term can be rewritten as $$ \limsup_{T\to0+}\frac{|f_T-f_0|}{|T-0|}\frac1{\eta_TT^{\alpha}}=(*). $$ where $\alpha:=\lambda+H-\varepsilon-1>0$.

Now if $\limsup_{T\to0+}\frac{|f_T-f_0|}{|T-0|}>0$ we'd get $(*)=+\infty$ thus we would have reached a contradiction, which would allow to get uniqueness.

The other case is $\limsup_{T\to0+}\frac{|f_T-f_0|}{|T-0|}=0$, from which we would have $\exists\lim_{T\to0+}\frac{|f_T-f_0|}{|T-0|}=0$, and thus, $f$ would be differentiable at 0 on the right. But here I'm stuck: how can we exclude this last limsup is zero?


Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.