4
$\begingroup$

Let P be a finite set of points on the unit sphere $S^2$ such that

  • for every $p\in P$, there exists a closed curve $\gamma_p \subset S^2$ which has a self intersection at $p$ and passes through $-p$. Moreover, every plane passing through $p$ and the origin intersect $\gamma_p$ in at most 2 points, excluding $-p$ (see the graph below by Neil Strickland).

  • At the self intersection point $p$, $\gamma_p$ is orthogonal to itself.

  • $\gamma_{p_1} \cap \gamma_{p_2} \subset P$ for every $p_1,p_2 \in P$

  • If $A_i \subset S^2$ be such that $\partial A_i \subset \gamma_{p_i}$, $p_i\in P$, i=1,2, then neither $A_1 \subset A_2$ nor $A_2 \subset A_1$.

  • $P \subset \gamma_p$ for all $p\in P$.

Can we prove that $P$ has at most one element? If not, what is the upper bound on the number of elements of $P$?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Please write couple of words on motivation. $\endgroup$ – Anton Petrunin Sep 5 '17 at 20:51
  • $\begingroup$ Is it OK to assume that $\gamma_p$ is smooth? $\endgroup$ – Anton Petrunin Sep 5 '17 at 23:01
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, $\gamma_p$ is indeed smooth. $\endgroup$ – User4966 Sep 5 '17 at 23:24
  • $\begingroup$ I find it hard to imagine even two of these curves satisfying all assumptions. Could you draw a picture with two or three curves, please? $\endgroup$ – Sebastian Goette Sep 6 '17 at 16:26
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, it's difficult to draw a picture. Indeed if P has more than one element , then it should have at least 4 element. $\endgroup$ – User4966 Sep 7 '17 at 5:07
4
$\begingroup$

This is just a comment, really. One can write a nice formula for a family of curves of the indicated type, as follows. Let $p$, $q$ and $r$ be an orthonormal basis of $\mathbb{R}^3$, and suppose that $a>0$. Put $$ C = \{x\in S^2: (q.x)\,(r.x)=a((q-r).x)(1 - p.x)\} $$ enter image description here

This can be parametrised as $$ \gamma(t) = \frac{(a^2(c-s)^2-s^2c^2)p+2asc(c-s)(cq+sr)}{a^2(c-s)^2+s^2c^2}, $$ where $s=\sin(t/2)$ and $c=\cos(t/2)$. This passes through $p$ with derivative $q/a$ at $t=0$ and through $p$ again with derivative $r/a$ at $t=\pi$. It also passes through $-p$ with derivative $-2a(q+r)$ at $t=\pi/2$. Maple code is as follows:

g := unapply(subs({s = sin(t/2),c=cos(t/2)},((a^2*( c-s)^2-s^2*c^2) *~ 
 [1,0,0] +~ (2*a*( c-s)*( s*c)) *~ [0, c, s])/~(a^2*( c-s)^2+s^2*c^2)),t);

Obviously this does not answer the question, but you might gain some intuition by plotting curves of this type.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.